I disagree with the commonly held opinion that all negotiations mean finding a win-win scenario.

Asked by Bill Kuhlman, Needham, MA Tue Jan 20, 2009

I say all real estate agents should focus on the needs of their own clients and shouldn't be concerned with the interests of the other party, except to the extent that they can use those interests to help their client get the best possible terms in a deal.

Surely, pursuing a win-win scenario is very often the best path to get the best terms for your client. What I'm saying, though, is that it is detrimental to your client's interests to give up more than is absolutely necessary in any negotiation. If your client doesn't need to make a concession in order to put together a deal, they shouldn't make it.

I'll go further and say that some agents---in a misguided effort to create a win-win---hurt their clients' interests by recommending they give up more than is necessary in order to close the deal.

What's your opinion?

Help the community by answering this question:

+ web reference
Web reference:


Scott A. Nel…, , 02155
Tue Jan 20, 2009
I think negotiations need tobe custom tailored to the individual situation & set of operational guidelines agreed upon by the client & agent, there are soo many variables. I agree in principal with your belief but it only works when your on the stronger side. Tough to drive a hard bargain when there are limiting factors on the side you represent. Every client deserves a zealous representation but tempered with the informed consent of the client.
Web Reference:  http://www.MedfordHouse.com
0 votes
Search Advice
Ask our community a question

Email me when…

Learn more