"Many folks as we know don't have the resources to make the correction." And that was a point I tried to make earlier. Whatever happened to moral obligations? While some companies are certainly participating in predatory lending, they still don't hold a gun to the heads of buyers to sign contracts they have no plans to honor ("we'll fix it later...").
If you give your word, you need to back it up. I sorta doubt I'd have my 839 Fica score had I taken the easy way out back then. Make iformed decisions and then stand by them! - Tue Mar 4 2008, 08:44
By the way, I didn't lose my *shirt* in LA...I sold an *airplane* to pay my $17000 to contribute to getting escrow to close. At least I did the honorable thing and didn't walk away leaving the bank holding the property...to drag down my neighbors property values...as they had done to me. - Tue Mar 4 2008, 07:35
Got a little tense in there, but not as bad as some threads. Your reasons for changing realtors sound very valid to me. The one we have now has "held us back" from making offers on 2 houses because she knew we really wouldn't be happy. We were settling and she could see it better than we could. The result is that we are buying a much better house for approximately $25,000 less than what we were gonna spend on the lesser houses...so even her commission is lower, thanks to her honesty.
Just take the good advice along with the not-so-good. Also note that most of your answers are coming from "Real Estate Professionals." Double-edged sword, that is... On one side, they make money off of folks like you and I and thus have vested interests...and on the other side, they likely have been thru hundreds of buys and do have a lot of good knowledge they can provide about things you should think about.
I don't have anything vested here (retired from state government) and this will be our 19th house...so we've been around the horn a few times.
There is another loan we took out in 1992 and another in 2003. I've not seen it lately, but may be offered somewhere. It is a 5/25, sometimes called a "2-step." The first 5 years are at one rate and it can adjust once and only once at the 5 yr mark. It will remain at that rate for the last 25 years. When we got it, it was 4.0% for the 5 yrs and could only go to 9.0% as worst case (which we planned for). As usual, we sold it in less than 5 yrs. I am only a fan of variables when there is rock solid certainty that we can either retire the mortgage or handle the increase... I'm old enough to remember the Jimmy Carter 1970s where houses were 18% and CDs paid 15%. I still consider anything under 10% to be good...and am headed to a 4.625% 7/1 loan on this house...can't exceed 9.625% in 7 years...
Sounds like you are well on your way. Do listen to all the stuff these folks are telling you, even the gruff ones. You are getting a lot more education than many first-time buyers get!!! - Tue Mar 4 2008, 07:32
Just a little more follow up. I agree renting is generally ugly. But if you bought a house for $250,000 and it went down 10% in a year (some areas have declined over 20% in 1 year...like in CA), then you will have "thrown away" $25000 by buying now...plus probably $4,000 in loan costs...or about the same as having paid $1800+ a month rent (after you subtract the mortgage tax benefit at 28%). Of course, if the house goes up in the year, the equivalent wasted rent would be lower. So renting isn't as disgusting as it used to be...in a flat or falling market like we are in.
Real life example: I purchased a house in North LA County in 1993. I "stole" it for $172,900. 9 months later, when I transferred, the best offer (only one) I could get was $154,500. So the cost of the original loan, plus 9 months of interest payments, plus the real estate commission to sell it, and that house cost me $42,000 real dollars to live in it for 9 months.... Had I spent $4000 a month for wasted rent money, I'd have been ahead. Hindsight is 20/20. I had planned to be there a long time, but circumstances changed and it really bit me.
So please, really weigh rent vs. owning for your particular case. It isn't as cut and dried as:
rent = wasted money -and- ownership = equity. - Sat Mar 1 2008, 10:52
Couple more comments: Only in a Seller's market would we buy from the listing agent. We've done that successfully once and the Realtor convinced the seller to take our offer over another: He makes the commission on both sides, and we developed a friendly relationship with him so he wanted us to "win". Our "clean" offer (and he helped us to make it clean, knowing what would appeal to the seller) was not the highest offer...but it was the one they accepted based on his recommendation. On our current buy, I can talk very openly and honestly with my trusted agent, as she knows how high we would go on the property we are now buying, but she won't share that with the selling agent. She knows how much we want the house, which is another thing I don't want the selling agent to know. If they did, they'd have a responsibility to the seller to raise us as high as they could. "Dual representation" of both buyer and seller is not a comfortable situation for a buyer...altho most Realtors like to show you their listings first. As someone said, the dual agent still has a bigger responsibility to the seller.
Re: the "small requests." Well this is essentially a pre-foreclosure property. Banks here do tend to agree to pay for 1 yr home warranties requested (about $350), and that still is in our contract. The only thing the builder wanted to take out was the list of additional items. He didn't balk at all on the price (which the bank will have to approve). Asking for things doesn't cost anything. On the house we sold in the summer, we'd have given a lot just to make it go away.
Re: your nothing to put down, are you sure now is the time for you personally to buy? What will happen if the market goes down another 10%? Will you be able to endure it? Nothing is a loss until you sell, just like in the stock market, so if you can ride out a 10% loss in value and definitely not try to resell the house within 3 years, then I encourage you to buy. If that is not the case, I think you should rent. As someone else said, get a prequalification letter to be able to include with your offer so they know you really can purchase their house. It costs so much more for a 100% loan than an 80% loan that in a level or falling market, I'd not buy if I had to borrow over 80% of the value... Just my 2 cents more... Save up the 20%. - Sat Mar 1 2008, 07:10
I've been on both sides in the past 6 months.
We're currently buying in AZ. Listing price on this builder's model was $339k after the most recent wave of reductions. It was built in 2006 and likely they were looking for $459k at the time. Well, they have reduced it again to $315k and said bring all offers...owner motivated. Turns out the builder is on the verge of letting the bank foreclose on this second property of his. Bank is highly motivated NOT to foreclose and our offer of $285k is reportedly gonna be close to what they need. Heckova discount. We trust our realtor, who suggested that figure. If you don't have a good and trusting relationship with your realtor, always remember that the more you pay, the more money goes into the Realtor's pocket. Don't be afraid to offer $250k for a $300 listed property. It all depends on the situation of the seller and whether they really want out...for whatever reason.
I'd never make 3-4 offers... We offered this price and asked them to install a water softener, garage door openers, etc ($2000 or less). We did that so they'd have something to decline besides just wanting the dollars raised.
Now the other side: We had a house here that was worth $550k when all the decline started. We chased the market down (poor realtor advice) to $524K....$489K...$469K and then changed realtors. She told us to list it at $425-$435k if we really wanted to sell it. We went to $425k and soon got an offer of $400k which we took. Today the house is likely worth $350k or less. We wanted out as we were away 7 months out of the year and it had a pool...that needed constant attention. It was such a pain, we just wanted out of the house and were considering draining the pool (causing plaster damage).
Your offer will be accepted or rejected based on the seller's need. Make your $250k offer and let them tell you what they need. The deal discussed earlier where the person made 4 offer, from low-ball to full price and then the seller rejected it, was a meeting of two stubborn folks who did not want to complete a transaction in my opinion! - Thu Feb 28 2008, 14:35