Cap rate for a multi unit property in San Francisco

Asked by Charles, San Francisco, CA Wed Sep 26, 2007

Looking at 2 unit with inlaw type property. I would want a cap rate of 6% (after ALL expenses). Maybe 5%. Is that realistic?

Help the community by answering this question:

3
Youâ€™ll find the article linked below very informative.
In its simplest form the cap-rate is the net operating income (NOI) divided by the sale price. If a building is bought with cash the NOI is very different then if it is leveraged. The article shows how to factor in the debt service and interest with the other factors so that your analysis is better.
San Francisco investors are investing in future equity definitely not cash flow. As someone once told me there are as many different investment reasons and goals as there are investors.
MVP'08
Contact
Jed, thanks for the answer. I'll believe the No, but I'm not sure about some of the analysis posted. As I understand the Cap rate, it is an estimate of what you would make if you are paying cash. Also it is net profit, not the example you gave of gross rent.
Obviously borrowing 70% at 6.5% changes the return.

So the question is, what is the value of the property I'm looking at? This particular property I'm looking at has gross rents of 72k a year. It has net profit after taxes and expenses of 60k. Therefore I'd be willing to pay \$1 million, if I expected a 6% cap rate. If I should expect a 5% cap rate, I would pay 1.2 million for this property. If it is less than 5%, I won't buy it, I'd rather have a Tresuary bill.

Are INVESTORS recieving the equivalant of 5% cap rate in San Francisco now? If not, why in the world are they investing?
Charles,
Short answer is no. Unless you paid cash, had no expenses or costs and could charge current market rents.
The cap rate is found by taking the "net" operating income and dividing that by the value or purchase price.
Annual rents of \$60,000 with a purchase price of \$1,000,000 would give you 6% cap rate if you had no expenses.
If you put 30% down on that \$1,000,000 your principle and interest payment, at 7% interest, would be over \$55,000/year leaving just \$5,000/year to pay insurance, repairs and cover vacancies, so your net income would actually be a negative number.
Web Reference: http://www.jedlane.com
Are you slow or something? He said gross rents were \$72K and net profit after taxes and expenses were \$60K
Flag Mon May 5, 2014
However, given the example above, and that you purchased a commercial property with a triple net lease you might have a better shot at acquiring your investment goal.
Flag Tue Dec 17, 2013
MVP'08
Contact

View all »