Property Q&A in Duluth>Question Details

Eric, Both Buyer and Seller in 55804

Are boilers as a primary heating source more expensive to heat your house?

Asked by Eric, 55804 Fri Feb 27, 2009

Minnesota can get pretty cold. I have seen many older houses that use boilers as their primary heating source. How efficient are they?

Help the community by answering this question:



Susan nailed it. Boilers are more efficient and last a lot longer.
0 votes Thank Flag Link Sat Feb 28, 2009
I have never heard of anyone that has used a boiler. I live in a pretty warm climate, though. I was in Minnesota last month and noticed this as well.
Flag Mon Apr 7, 2014
Hi, Eric! Do you mean boilers for hot water radiators? If that's the case, then, yes that is a cheaper and cleaner way to heat your home. It requires less energy for the water to be heated and circulated through the radiators than for a forced air furnace to heat air and blower motor to circulate it through the ventilation. Because of the air blowing around the house, it makes the air dryer and blows dust and dirt around the house, too. But, because of the ease of having a central air conditioning system using the same system, it has become predominant in houses by and large for the last 50 years or so.

You will want to maintain the mechanics of your boiler the same way you maintain any kind of heating element, but because there are fewer moving parts, they tend to remain functional longer than forced air units. Make sense?
0 votes Thank Flag Link Sat Feb 28, 2009
Search Advice
Ask our community a question
Email me when…

Learn more

Copyright © 2016 Trulia, Inc. All rights reserved.   |  
Have a question? Visit our Help Center to find the answer