Questions about Crime are very common here...
If you want the truth, You need to call local law enforcement and they will give you the real scoop... They work those streets everyday and are more than happy to share it with you... more
Well, to paraphrase an ex-President ("It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."), it depends on what your definition of "a good price" is.
Still, the short answer is: No.
Annette explained the process pretty well. Some investors may have a cut-off of $25,000 or so. I know some investors who won't do it for less than $40,000. It depends. That really depends on the investor as well as the home prices (and so the potential profit) in a certain geographic area.
But investors are offering less (on a percentage basis) now than they were a few years ago. That's because the money that many of them have to borrow (so-called "hard money") has gotten tighter. It used to be that an investor could borrow at least 65% (sometimes 70%) of the ARV (after-repair value), and the investor's credit really didn't matter. The loan was based strictly on the equity in the property.
Now the terms are more likely to be 60% of the ARV, and the investor needs reasonably good credit and some "skin in the game."
Besides, investors have a lot more properties to pick and choose from than they did 5 or 6 years ago.
But here's generally how it works: The investor calculates how much a home will be worth after repairs. That's the ARV, or after-repair value. The investor may take 60% (maybe 65%) of that. Now the investor subtracts those repairs. Might be as minimal as paint and carpet. It might be as major as new kitchen, bathrooms, and HVAC. The investor subtracts the repairs from the earlier figure. That's the absolute most an investor will pay. He or she probably will offer less.
Example: You have a house that, in fixed-up condition, would be worth $300,000. It needs $15,000 in maintenance and repairs. We start by taking 60% of the $300,000. That's $180,000. Then we subtract the $15,000 in maintenance and repairs. Now we're down to $165,000. That's the most that many investors will pay. So ;you might get initial offers of $139,000 to $149,000. Maybe something in the low $150,000s.
Compare that to what you might get by listing with an agent. If you sold the house as-is (not doing any of the needed $15,000 in repairs), you might price it around $250,000. Perhaps $260,000. Allowing for commissions and other expenses, you might net (very roughly) $225,000-$240,000.
There are certainly some advantages to selling to an investor. The deal can close quickly, and you really can sell a property in as-is condition. You won't have people tromping through your home, and you won't be nickel-and-dimed to death by a buyer.
But getting a "good price" is seldom one of the advantages.