BEST ANSWER
Marian, I stated it here:
http://www.trulia.com/voices/Market_Conditions/The_estate_of
It is a link to the futures prices at the time of posting on the case schiller index for the NY metro area. Given the opinion of the financial markets or people in the profession, that choices is easy.
Brooklyn Buyer, half, not close, that said the index is built a large area and the I believe it is a bit pessimistic personally, but a lot smarter people than me price those futures and trade them accordingly. If you're looking in areas that are high income with good schools, you'll probably be insulated more than the areas current under development and undergoing revitalization. When the money starts to fade, which it is with the 80,000 jobs lost last month, the revitalization of bad areas will basically just become nicer buildings in bad areas. I do believe the entire area is going to take a sizeable hit though, including manhattan. Foreign money has helped prop up manhattan but they can't buy co-ops and others have posted here talking about how the lag in data is making manhattan look a lot rosier than it is. The other burroughs and surrounding counties will feel it more since its not nearly as exciting for a foreign buyer to a house in chappaqua unles she's hoping to catch a view of Bill Clinton in a tryst with an intern, and even then, he should probably be looking in Harlem.
Anyway, I'm just trying to point out the data to people who seem to believe investing in real estate and buying houses is always a good idea. This isn't true.
Sat Apr 5 2008, 14:46