We recently inherited a house that needs much cosmetic sprucing in the North HIll area- paint, floors, siding
washed, etc. but the agent stated that they are not worth doing. I felt that without it, their recommended list price was way high. After one month, no offers. I know it's early, but should the work be done first? I would think the return on the small investment will be positive.
Sat Feb 9 2008, 09:23 - North Hill - Home Selling - 2 answers
|
|||||||
| Answers (2) | ||
| Show me: Recent Answers Oldest Answers Highest Rated |
|
|
| Linda Stickl was FIRST TO ANSWER | ||
|
BEST ANSWER
I do not know why a realtor would object to cosmetic improvements as they are the cheapest and most productive. The cost is mostly elbow grease and the returns are usually in the thousands of dollars. Either make those improvemants or price it to reflect that they need to be done by the buyer after the sale. Do the scenario you are most comfortable with and disregard the bad advice.
Sat Feb 9 2008, 10:07 Web Reference: http://www.liveinakron.com
|
|
||||||
|
BEST ANSWER
FIRST ANSWER
I agree with you! It sounds like the things you mentioned are relatively low cost cosmetic fixes. Whatever you can do to make the house look updated and move in ready will help attract more potential buyers. Of course, price is key as well.
Sat Feb 9 2008, 09:44 Web Reference: http://www.stagingandorganizing.com
|
|
||||||
San Francisco real estate | New York real estate | Los Angeles real estate | Orlando real estate | Miami real estate | Philadelphia real estate | Phoenix real estate | San Diego real estate | San Jose real estate | Chicago real estate | Arizona real estate | California real estate | Florida real estate | Illinois real estate | Massachusetts real estate | New Jersey real estate | Pennsylvania real estate | Texas real estate | Other local real estate | Home price maps
Copyright © 2008 Trulia, Inc. All rights reserved. |