I'm a single professional female ,46, who inherited the home I in. It's quite modest but it is the only true nest-egg I have. I live in Gulfport MS and would like to move back to a metropolitan area for better career options but recently found out that my homeowner's insurance company does not offer insurance if the property becomes a rental. I think this fallout from some Hurricane Katrina-related insurance changes in the region. I'd like to keep the house just to know I always have a home to go to, but am also aware there could always be another bad hurricane and if the property is a rental, even with alternate insurance, FEMA will not assist and getting insurance pay out may be iffy. Am I better off just selling and taking a less than ideal price to go to an area where my investment would be safer? Even if it means using this as a down payment and taking out a mortgage at my age? If there's something I'm not considering, please let me know. Any advice/input appreciated.
First I would check with more than 1 insurance company on coverage for a non-owner occupied home. Second I would say their are many tax advantages to having a rental. I have many rentals and the tax benefits
are astounding. I would contact an tax accountant and go over the pro's and con's of renting this property.
It looks like you need some advice from a couple of people. One is going to be an insurance agent. You can get an insurance rating on the companies to determine how financially sound they are before you pick one. Find one that is either guaranteed by your state (if they have this like Florida) or has a B+ to A+ rating. This will protect you and your property whether it is a rental or a primary.
Second you need to find out the tax liability because rental income is taxable but rental payments are not tax deductible so find out first if benefits you for tax reasons to hold the house or take a hit.
Third talk to a realtor about the time on market - if it seems like it may take a while to lease or to sell - you may jeopardize any job opportunities if you don't know the time on market for your area.
Diana,
Depending on your risk tolerance this sounds like a scenario where selling the home would make the most sense. If you decided to keep the home it sounds like (at best) you could find some way to insure the property but that the "what if's" will continue to linger in your mind. Given the current market conditions in real estate in most areas, you may have to take less that the ideal price for your home, but you'll have a great buying opportunity after you sell the house and liquidate the cash.
Diana,
You require the insight of a local real estate professional. Someone that knows the area well and has a realistic understanding of the marketability of the home and how much it will bring in today's market.
With accurate sales information it will be easier to project the net difference between selling at a lower price and renting.
Good luck
Didn’t find what you were looking for? Ask a question!
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|