BEST ANSWER
Why do you think it should be $450,000? There are many houses that were valued or appraised 6 months ago and have lost more than 20% of their value in a short time. Maybe the seller is in a "have to sell" situation". I just listed a house at 80% of the "market value" because the seller wanted (and needed) the house to sell and close within 30 days. Luckily, we had multiple offers and the property sold for much higher than asking price. Yes, the seller was prepared to accept an offer at asking price and we needed to create instant activity so the marketing price was a seller strategy to get the highest possible dollar amount in the shortest possible time. Seller's are happy their property is sold in 30 days. Buyer is happy they got a great deal on a house.
I'll assume, for my opinion in this situation, that the house is truly valued at $450,000 today and $379,000 is at 80% of value.
As with Bill and Scott's previous answers, I don't know of anyplace that would say it's illegal. Unlike Bill and Scott's answers I don't think anyone would determine it to be unethical or immoral as long as the seller is prepared to accept a cash offer at the asking price. My advise, as with any buyer in this type of transaction is, determine what it's worth to you and make your best offer first. It you get it, then great, you bought a house at your price. If you don't get it then feel comfortable in the fact that you made your best offer and would not have purchased it at any price higher than what you offered. Minimum bids, disclosed multiple offers and competitive bidding have been around for...... well, forever.
Tue Sep 16 2008, 07:24