Any house built before 1975 is likely to contain asbestos. You notice the key word is "likely". If you have blown ceilings you may have asbestos there, too. Depending on which real estate brokerage you use, you may have a disclosure about the possiblity of asbestos, or you may not. I wouldn't worry about it at this time. When it comes time to sell your house, you may find a place to disclose this within the forms you fill out that asks but the contracts that are used in CA talk about asbestos in older homes. It is a known fact.

Your agent should have mentioned asbestos when you bought the house but since he/she didn't, be aware of it in the future. You can never over disclose any known fact about your house to potential sellers. EVER.

Mon Mar 10 2008, 14:54

thanks for all the replies, very helpful.

Wed Oct 31 2007, 07:54

If you know it, then you definitely should disclose it. I believe that any company that removes asbestos needs to have a special state certification -- a typical contractor wouldn't do the work, so it's right that 90% of the time they don't do it (although I'd hope that the 10% of the time that it's done they have certified workers doing it). I recently replaced my furnace, and it cost about $1000 to remove all the asbestos between the old furnace and the 50 year old heater ducts. If you're in the San Mateo area, R&R Marcucci Heating is a great company (though for asbestos removal, they will outsource it to a certified vendor).

Thu Oct 25 2007, 12:01

Jamie, I agree with Cindy, find out how much it will cost to remove it and if it isn't too much just do it. Otherwise you will have to disclose it now that you know about and it will effect the value. As far as the previous owner you most likely would have to proof they knew about it and didn't disclose. That can be hard to do. Michael

Thu Oct 25 2007, 11:26

Hello Jamie. If the owners knew about the asbestos in the air duct insulation, then they probably should have disclosed it. The mere fact that it's present is not necessarily a problem as long as the insulation is still intact so that the asbestos cannot get airborne. I am wondering what the HVAC contractor said about getting the air ducts tested for leakage. Since you are located in CA, you'll have to comply with both federal and CA regulations for air duct testing any time you upgrade or replace a heating or conditioning unit. There are some exceptions to the air duct testing, but I don't know if your home qualifies. You will probably also need a permit to replace the furnace and the permit maybe conditioned upon compliance with the air duct testing requirement. I am mentioning this because some contractors do not comply with those requirements and when you want to sell, you'll have to deal with it at the time of the sale. You can go the the following website to get more information about the air duct testing requirements and see if you might qualify for one of the exemptions http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/changeout/2005-08-02_NEW_DU…

Good luck,
Ute Ferdig

Thu Oct 25 2007, 10:44

I would say you should hire the asbestos guys and have done with it. Now that you know, there is a duty to disclose, since a new owner can see that furnace work was done, and you would have known. What would you think if you were on the jury?

If you do the work now, you can tell a buyer that you have done the asbestos work with certified guys.

As far as asbestos, it only takes a little bit, anyway. It was in hair dryers, too, and school tiles. It's probably more than a little bit, if it was used for insulation. What? Insulate just a little bit of the ducts?

Thu Oct 25 2007, 10:25

Have you contacted the company referred to you by your contractor for a quote on what is involved to remove it? That would be my first suggestion.

Material defects..disclose, disclose.

Thu Oct 25 2007, 10:23