what are the benefits of using the same broker who is both representing the buyer and the seller?

Casey
Home Buyer
Boston, MA

We have been working with a broker for several weeks and have finally decided that we are most interested in a property in which she is also the exclusive agent. Should we find another broker to represent us, or just use a lawyer during the closing?

Answers (7)
First to answer: Mikem
Wendy Bornstein
Agent
Dover, MA

A buyers agent will represent your interests and have fiduciary responsibility to you as a buyers agent. A sellers agent has fiduciary responsibility to the property owner. Thus it may not be in your best interest to have the agent serve in both capacities. In Massachusetts, if an agent is representing both the buyer and the seller it must be disclosed and the agent must keep an arm's length to both parties. If you have built a relationship with the broker it would still be worthwhile to have your own independant resource to protect your interests.

Thu Feb 28 2008, 14:00
Eastie Agent
Agent
East Boston, MA

In your question you stated: "or just use a lawyer during the closing." You should realize that the closing attorney only represents the interests of your mortgage lender during closing. So if you went with the listing broker and closing attorney only, you would have no one representing your interests.

You can hire an attorney to represent you as a buyer. Often, that attorney will handle the closing as well, which is a generally accepted practice because at the point of closing all of the key terms of the transaction have been negotiated (with the attorney representing the buyer) and at closing the lender and buyer's interests are seen as aligned. Mainly, both parties want to make sure the buyer gets clean title.

Jim

Sat Feb 23 2008, 23:55
Belinda Arroyo
Agent
02038

Not a good idea just for the reasons that the other realtors gave you0. Always get your own real estate lawyer to look out for your interest.

Mon Jan 28 2008, 10:20

Casey, the answer is in your question- "same broker who is representing the buyer and the seller". If your agent is the listing agent, they have agreed to represent the seller with fiduciary. Even if the agency relationship changes in order to accomodate your offer, having your own representative who agrees to make every effort to get you the best price would appear to be the only alternative that assures you of this effort. I would also avoid obtaining buyer agency via the company that has the listing- you need someone with no connection to the transaction. It is your right to be represented, and it will be your dollars that are impacted- as a buyer, getting the best possible price is an objective that can only be secured with a degree of certainty by having your own representation.

Web Reference: http://optionsrealty.com
Sun Jan 27 2008, 10:29
Alan May
Agent
Evanston, IL

There are far more negatives to using the same agent who represents the property, than there are any potential benefits. Yes, find another agent to represent you so that your rights are protected and you have an advocate working for you.

There are too many conflicts of interest, in using the same agent.

Sun Jan 27 2008, 09:28
Sandy Nelson
Agent
Olympia, WA

Casey,
I would not recommend the dual agency relationship. I never understood how a Realtor can negotiate on the best behalf of two opposing parties. I stay away from those kind of scenarios. I'd rather have my clients represented by another Realtor if they wanted to buy one of my listings, than to have them have doubts about having received full representation by me. I believe most clients appreciate me looking out for their best interest and will come back to me for their future real estate needs.

Sandy

Sun Jan 27 2008, 09:21
Mikem
Agent
01803
FIRST ANSWER

There are two things that can happen if a broker represents both the buyer and the seller. Broker becomes facilitator for both, basicaly broker will handle all the paperwork and make sure that everythign is going as it should be, but will not be able to advise ither the seller or the buyer as to what to offer, or what to ask for as far as contingencies go (ie, you want seller to pain the siding etc) Basically you lose the "negotiator" part of the services an agent offers, and so does the seller.

Option two is the agent will remain as sellers agent and will become facilitator to you. Meaning He/she is still working as a full service agent for the seller, but is only facilitator to you, meaning you lose the "negotiator" part of the service, but the seller still get their.

It's also possible that the agent will be willing to work with another agent in their office for negotiation part, ie, your agent would represent the seller, and some other agent would represent you in the negotiations, but your agent would handle all the paper work etc.

Benefits? Depends on a situation, if you are offering near or full asking price, and have no contingencies (other than the usual mortagage and inspection) then by working with the same agent, you may get an easier/faster transaction, since your agent wwouldhandle everything and won't need to wait for listing agent to get back to them etc.

But that's about it. Seller might have it in their contract that if the listing agent gets both sides of a commission than the total comission is lower (ie. 6% normal, 5% if agent gets both sides) but that has no impact on you since you still pay 100% of whatever offer you make.

I would suggest you talk to you agent, see what they would do if you were to buy their listing. Although, if you plan to lowball or negotiate a lot, I'd suggest working with a different agent, and your current agent could get a referral.

Sun Jan 27 2008, 08:52

Didn’t find what you were looking for? Ask a question!

Search Advice

Ask a question

Got a real estate question? Get answers from locals, experts and real estate pros.
Ask
Email me when…

Learn more

View all » 1 - 3 of 172
Copyright © 2009 Trulia, Inc. All rights reserved.   |   Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
Help us improve our service—send us feedback