FHA has different loan limits.
PMI is less on FHA than Conventional for the higher LTVs.
Some properties will not be eligible for FHA that Conventional may take.
FHA has a minimum of 5yrs for PMI. Regardless of how much you put down.
No PMI on an FHA loan with 10% down and 15yr term.
And the list goes on, and on, and on.
The best thing to do is have a loan officer who does BOTH loans do a comparative analysis of both loans on YOUR deal.
Yes, pmi is mandated on conventional with less than 20% down.
Do you have a realtor? Have them refer you to a loan officer who can do both loans....
Feel free to contact me for any follow up to this or any other question without a sales pitch.
Good Luck!!!
A conventional loan is offered by a bank without any guarantee of repayment from a government agency. Typically, these loans carry private mortgage insurance (PMI), which insures the bank in case of non-payment by the borrower for amounts over 80% of the property value. So, if the lender loans 95% of the value of the property, the private mortgage insurance covers them for 15%.
Conventional loans had been the loan of choice until the recent problems in California, Nevada and other places where the loans are not being repaid and the property values have dropped below the loan amount. Now, FHA is more favored because the risk to the bank is lower. The rates for both are similar.
Conventional loans typically are for 80% of the property value. A borrower can get an additional second loan to cover another 10% 15% or even 17%, making the combined loan-to-value ration equivalent to FHA's 3% down. Some conventional lenders also offer a single loan, rather than two loans.
FHA currently requires the buyer to bring at least 3% of his own funds to closing. This will rise to 3.5% at the end of September. FHA-guaranteed loans also have a mortgage insurance premium (MIP), similar to PMI. The MIP can be added onto the loan instead of being paid as a closing cost.
There are other types of loans, too, such as VA or Texas Vet and others. Each has their own advantages and costs.
Remember that buying a house is a little like buying a car. A car price may be quoted as +TTL (plus tax, title and license). Your house will have additional closing costs, like title insurance, survey, lender fees and so on, plus you will have to pay for your homeowner's insurance and put some money aside for property taxes, called prepaids. When someone buys a $100k house with 3% down, they wind up bringing more than $3000 to the closing because of the closing costs and prepaids.
A loan officer can explain in more details how it all works. Just ask.
Over the past several years, conventional loans were so attractive with 100% financing, etc., that FHA loans were not needed as much and had taken a "back burner". Over the past few months, FHA loans are gaining popularity once again.
Generally, the most apparent difference is that FHA requires less money down. In some cases as little as 3%. Also, FHA likes to know that the home you are buying is in good condition. Therefore, it may be hard to get an FHA loan on a home that needs lots of work. FHA underwriting conditions may seem more strict than a conventional loan, i.e. a leaner paper trail of your money in and money out,
However, with all the foreclosures coming to light over the past several months, conventional loan conditions seem to be just as strict and in some cases more so than FHA. Generally, in today's market, conventional lenders are requiring 10-20% down, depending on your credit. You may be able to find an investor that will take 5% down with excellent credit.
It's my experience that PMI is required with less than 20% down on a conventional loan. As for PMI on FHA loans, I'm not certain however, I'd venture to say that it would apply the same as conventional. I would be happy to verify that for you should you'd like to inquire with me further.
"I Love What I Do!"
Joan Long, Realtor http://www.joanlong.com
