It's a way some agents have of "fishing" to see if the seller (or seller's agent) thinks an offer might be well-received, and worth writing. A verbal offer is not enforceable, and since it's not written-down, it's often loaded with misunderstandings, since things are not spelled-out.
Let's take for example... your realtor gives a verbal offer to the seller at $500,000. The seller agrees... "go ahead and write it up"... when it's written, they suddenly notice that you've asked for a 200% tax proration, you expect the seller to pay for all the inspections (including termite, mold and radon), the contract is contingent on selling YOUR home first, and they have 180 days to close.
The seller says "if I'd known about all of those other contingencies, I would never have accepted $500,000... so the contract is null and void, OR you can pay $600,000.
Do you see this ending well? Everyone's feelings are hurt, and the deal dies. Always better to put it in writing.
If you are interested in a property, truly interested, always put it in writing. Power and influence of the written word can make an enormous difference. Good luck!!
A shrewd negotiator may make an offer verbally and then bury their "conditions" in fine print. Then, they will try to make you feel like you are one not complying because you already "agreed".
When people call me to see if my seller's will accept less on a listing, I always tell them the only way to find out is to submit a written offer since the only I know as fact is at full price and normal contingencies, the home will be sold as listed. Even if a Realtor knows a seller will accept less, they are not supposed to share that confidential information!
HOWEVER: A listing agent MUST unless directed by their seller (and I'd get it in writing) present ANY AND ALL OFFERS whether VERBAL or WRITTEN. An agent cannot make a decision that a verbal offer is too low and therefor not communicate it to the seller. This would be considered "concealment" and is punishable by the licensing Board. The listing agent would be in VERY hot water if the seller ever found out that his agent had a verbal offer that he or she never told them about. What if things changed in the seller's life that caused the seller to accept a lowball offer and the agent didn't present? Not good and I wouldn't want to be that agent.
An agent representing a seller must legally present all offers --verbal or written--to the seller . However, there are instances where the agent representing the seller may decide that the verbal is too low and unfortunately not inform the seller of your intent to purchase. Hense, your verbal never trickles down to the true decision maker. With that, and piggy-backing on a previous comments, I would highly suggest putting your offer in writing.
Matthew Le Baron, D.B. Trust Realty
A verbal offer is only a way to test the waters. To be quite honest, they hold no value whatsoever. If you are trying to test the water on a property, you'll want to make sure it is in writing. A written offer is much more appealing to the seller when they can touch and feel the offer itself.
A good Realtor doesn't make a practice of putting in verbal offers, and furthermore, a good Realtor will do their best to present at good looking written offer directly to the sellers. That way, they can pitch your offer to the sellers and bring some emotion to the situation and use some good negotiating tactics.
