Home Buying in Culver City>Question Details

Khalif Majied…, Real Estate Pro in Altadena, CA


Asked by Khalif Majied, CMI, M.A., Altadena, CA Wed Sep 8, 2010

Help the community by answering this question:


I don't think they've become a thing of the past, but I do think that people have realized that most mold inspections done are unreliable at best. It would be nice if someone took on a liablility greater than the cost of the inspection if they are wrong.
0 votes Thank Flag Link Mon Jan 17, 2011
I agree with JD, I recommend every one of my buyers to get one and have them sign the disclosures recommending it as well. It is really up to the buyer if they want to pay for the inspection at this point, but I always advise to do it.
0 votes Thank Flag Link Mon Jan 17, 2011
I tell every buyer I represent to have a mold inspection!

California Microbial is the company that I always use.
Web Reference: http://MrWestside.com
0 votes Thank Flag Link Mon Sep 27, 2010
Mold cannot be 'killed with Bleach'

It is important that people have a full understanding of the health dangers of mold and how to properly remove it...NOT all molds are toxic however research has confirmed that they all cause different health issues the most common is chronic Allergies especially in the very young and the elderly..

I'm a mold certified inspector any questions ask me free @ my new questions and answers website, see the link below
Web Reference: http://www.ASKinspector.com
0 votes Thank Flag Link Fri Sep 10, 2010
MOLD is a four letter word!

Usually the buyer will rely on their home inspector and their own visual inspection to look for any water intrusion or mold. If anything is noted, the buyer will pay for a test.

The actual mold test usually entails taking an air sample inside and outside a home. Mold is everywhere. What the test looks to see is if there is a higher concentration inside the home as oppossed to outside the home. There are not accepted levels of mold. If their is a higher concentration inside a more invasive inspection will look for the source. The inspectition and samples can cost $400-$800. It is not cheap.

If visible mold is found a swap sample is taken to see if any is considered toxic, but the real issue is finding the water source that is allowing the mold to grow. Once the water intrusion is found and rectified the mold damaged drywall or wood is removed and the room can be cleaned with big filters.

Truth be told, most mold can be killed with a $2 spray bottle and some bleach solution, but no one makes any money with that so they sell you on a $10,000 remediation with big air filters that run for a day or two.

There was a huge amount of public awareness of the mold issue that has waned. It is still an issue that we all look for, but buyers are relying on their visual inspection and their home inspector to first find any signs of mold before they spend a bunch of money on a test.
0 votes Thank Flag Link Fri Sep 10, 2010
Never. I think most people rely on their home inspectors first, they go around with their moisture detectors & if they detect moisture anywhere then homebuyers go & get an actual mold inspection. However I've seen it both ways, a home buyer will order a home & separate mold inspector to go out as well.

My mold inspector is Bob Senel his website is http://www.MoldinCalifornia.com, yup I go to the guy who actually wrote a Book on the subject of mold!

562-430-3053 cell
0 votes Thank Flag Link Wed Sep 8, 2010
It's not required on standard inspections however I always look for excessive moisture and "apparent" mold on my inspections by Infrared and moisture detectors, I think it's just good basic practice. I have found latent moisture on about 20% of my standard inspections.
Web Reference: http://www.CAcertified.com
0 votes Thank Flag Link Wed Sep 8, 2010
Search Advice
Ask our community a question
Email me when…

Learn more

Copyright © 2014 Trulia, Inc. All rights reserved.   |  
Have a question? Visit our Help Center to find the answer