BEST ANSWER
Hello Teryl. You have to clearly distinguish between foreclosure and short sale. In CA most foreclosures are done by way of trustee sale which cuts off the foreclosing lender's ability to pursue the borrower for a deficiency judgment unless certain exceptions apply (e.g., borrower committed waste, fraud, abandonment of the property). If the lender wants to preserve the right to sue for a deficiency judgment, the lender has to foreclose via judicial foreclosure which takes a lot longer and will most likely cost more than the trustee sale route. If the foreclosing lender chooses the trustee sale, it does not matter whether your loan was a recourse or non-recourse loan. However, if you have a second loan (junior lien holder) and the senior lien holder forecloses through trustee sale, it does matter whether the second loan was a purchase money loan or a loan that was obtained after the original purchase. If the second loan was a non-purchase money loan, the second lien holder can try to collect on the now unsecured promissory note and if the second lender chooses to do so and obtains a money judgment, the lender may choose to record the judgment in the county in which you have your other house and it would appear as a lien against that property. The lender may also forgive the loan and issue a 1099 and it is possible that you won't know what the lender decides to do until the statute of limitations prevents the collection on the promissory note.
If you negotiate a short sale with the lenders, none of the anti-deficiency laws apply since there's no foreclosure. Unless the lender(s) expressly release you from all claims, they can try and recover the difference of what was owed and what they received from the short sale.
I hope this helps.
Tue Jul 22 2008, 22:06