Joshua, the agent disclosing to you the highest offer to date it not a ethics violation if he/ or she has permission from the seller to disclose the highest offer.

I too have watched agents lower the prices of foreclosures and short sales that they already have offers on. That disclaimer that "all offers are subject to bank approval" almost gives them permission to do with the price what they want. I believe these agents are reducing the price after they already have 20 plus offers on the table to increase their phone calls to obtain buyers for other properties... just my theory.

One of my girlfriends who is also a Keller Williams Agent just sold a short sale...by the time the bank was done they only received $1200 a piece in commission for a deal that took 6 months to bring to the closing table. Banks are cutting the commissions. I have had other agent friends remain strong with the banks regarding their commissions and they have one the battle so we need to realize that we dictate what we are worth. When the home goes into foreclosure and back onto the listing block... the commission is not negotiable once it is placed in the listing service so why should it be on a short sale. Something for us all to think about!

Yes, it is a trend. I've heard from other agents who are hoping to sell short that the bank has told them to drop the price to something guaranteed to produce offers. There was a short sale in Morningside recently where a home originally priced around $900k was dropped to $500k and I was told they had something like 12 offers on the table within 24 hours. I've seen multiple examples recently. It appears to be becoming a popular strategy among agents who market short sales. The listing will have a disclaimer in the MLS like "subject to bank terms and approval."

Joshua,

This does not have much impact on you or your client, but I would be interested to know about the listing agreement the agent has on this home.

If someone makes a full price offer at what the home is listed at and the seller does not take this offer then the seller would be obligated to pay that agent his/her commission unless there are some other stipulations included in their listing agreeement.

I'm not sure if this is a violation, but it's sure not smart. Who thinks they are going to sell a home for 10K above the list price in this market!

Talk to your broker. This may be an ethics violation.

another problem that can occur is, if the agent promises to pay a commission based on "listed price" then buyers agent makes full "listed price" offer. Selling agent may have to pay out of pocket all due commissions to the buying agent.

first of all, realtors dont make up a price. It is the property owners responsibility to know that the loan payoff.

Saying that, I know several agents that list houses for less than "payoff" the homeowners are upside down on the loans and will be paying out of pocket to sell at listed price.

it is not illegal

As a home buyer this concerns me. How is this not "willful deceit" or a form of "Bait and Switch"? I don't think this is a good practice for agents to be in with the market like this already. It seems it would harm the home sellers property values that are located in the neighoborhood. The lower priced home that wil later sell for me is listed near a home priced fairly and correctly.

Please don't give into unethical practices. Some of the lenders and appraisers already did this, and now we are all suffering from their short-sided behavior. Remember your ethics training and your own personal values. Think how you would feel if you took time driving clients around to view these homes at $4 gallon, they get excited and think they are getting a good deal, only to find out someone is trying to pull a fast one on them. It may turn them off to their buyers agent (YOU) and the whole home buying experience.

Let's play fair here. You are all licensed professinals. We as home sellers and buyers need to be able to trust you, especially in times like these. Don't lie to people...just to get a deal. I'm disappointed to hear about this. I hope a housing commission and realtor ethics boards get involved on this issue and some licenses are suspended or revolked. If it feels wrong to you guys, who are trained in this and who know intuitively what doesn't seem ethical--imagine how an unsuspecting/uninformed buyer would feel.

Thanks Chris for your posting. I will certainly pass it on. All I have to say is Amen... I feel that the agents who list these properties ridiculously low know that the bank will no way take the offer. Banks do communicate and give guidance to the listing agent. I have personally done short sale listings in the past (prefer not to) and I had no problems with communicating price with the banks and getting guidance on where the price needs to be.

Ethics Violation? Technically no, the agreement is with the Seller not the bank, everything gets "skirted" with the subject to clause.*

* The only problem would be if they were suggesting a higher price when there were no offers. The ethics violation here is that the agent has disclosed the highest offer.

This is not an REO we are talking about, it's a Short Sale.

i am not sure lisa, but I think Joshua is talking about reo's. When I list a short sale property I always put in the mls "subject to bank approval" in, also that any commision reductions by bank to be split 50/50 between buying and selling agent...
Leanne

wow Joshua, I haven't heard of this one yet! I agree with most of the posts that you have received, that you should contact your board, in my area the rules state that you have to have a valid/signed listing agreement for the price that you put in the MLS. I would write my offer and submit it, as mentioned in other posts no one knows for sure what a bank will or will not take. What we do know for sure is that they want these properties sold asap!! So if the agent is playing weird games, I don't know for sure here people I am just assuming this has to be coming from the agent, just give them your best offer and see where it flies..
good luck
leanne

At my MLS board, I've been told that you only have to state somewhere - something like "price and terms are subject to lender approval" to get around the MLS rules, contractual gotchas, etc..
It's clearly a tactic to get multiple bids going, (and it unfortunately works) enabling the lender to pick the highest - without any contractual downside because the lender is not legally a party to the transaction. Neat huh?

Hey Joshua:

I have been a Principal Broker for 14+ years and this issue is interesting. First your local MLS guidelines should address the listing price. When a listing is usually entered into a participating MLS a form of proof of listing price is required i.e. a copy of the listing contract. The local MLS that you participate with would and should have governing power of this issue. The agent asking for more is just pure blovication! Write your offer with the terms your client wants and submit it to the listing agent. In other words let's see what the lender responds to in writing. It sounds like you have a listing agent fishing the price and seeing how savvy you are. My advice, put him or her to the test! Put it in writing your way.

Dear Joshua,

This is interesting. Is it that the bank is trying to collect buyers and hoping for a bidding war? I would be stressed that if the bank is not able to fullfill their "marketing price/offer" (on the lower of the priceses explained above) that you could have an ethics question on your hands. But if the bank is serious about selling and they believe this choice in marketing will deliver the results they want....????

I would be interested in how this one plays out. Do keep us in the loop.

-Karissa

The agent most likely does not know what the bank will or will not take. Example: We have under contract one where the agent said they would not take a contingency for the sale of our purchasers home, that there could not be a due dilligance period, and they would not negotiate on price. We got the first two plus $15,000 off list price & $3,500 in closing.