
While alternative energy sources have been available for quite some time, recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the number of individual homeowners deciding to "go green". This eco-friendly trend can be seen in many places, but few statistics illustrate our nation's hunger for sustainable energy like the increases seen in geothermal heat pump and solar panel installation.
By recycling, purchasing more energy-efficient vehicles and home components, and supporting businesses that leave less of an imprint on the environment, the past few years have certainly shown that we, as a nation, have made a cleaner, more sustainable future one of our priorities. Recently, however, we've seen an incredible increase in the number of folks willing to take conservation to the next level by outfitting their homes to use alternative energy sources.
Residential Solar Panel Installation
If the number of homeowners who install solar panels continues to grow at its current rate, President Obama should have no problem achieving his goal of doubling the production of alternative energy in the next three years. Though it is difficult to calculate the total number of solar panels installed each year, we got the figures from ServiceMagic to see just how much interest in these devices has grown. In 2006, ServiceMagic counted 4,269 requests for solar panel installation nationwide; by 2008, their count was a whopping 67,062! If you do the math, that's an increase of 1471 percent!
Geothermal Heat Pump Installation
Though not quite as dramatic, significant increases have also been seen in the amount of homeowners opting to install geothermal heating and cooling systems. Two years ago, ServiceMagic processed 5,449 requests to install geothermal systems; in 2008, that number rose to 24,269.
The Cost of Going Green
A modest solar panel installation suitable for running a few devices can easily be had for $1,000 or less, but costs of $20,000 or more are common when creating a completely solar powered home. Geothermal heat pumps are generally considered the most cost-effective way to heat and cool a property in the long run, but can be several times more expensive to install than a conventional heating and cooling system.
Though the expense of these devices might seem like a deal-breaker, especially with the nation's current economic uncertainty, increasing federal and state incentives, good planning and financing, and the proven long-term savings of getting fully or partially off the grid can each play an important role in making a green upgrade more affordable. For example, anyone building a new house or entering a new mortgage may be able to add the cost of installing solar panels or geothermal heat in the loan; in many cases the amount you save every year on utility bills will be more than enough to exceed the amount that was added to your mortgage by installing the system.
Is Your Home a Good Candidate for Solar or Geothermal Power?
If your main reason for installing a solar or geothermal system is an environmental one, you can rest assured that both of these technologies can make quite an impact in reducing the pollution your home produces. However, as many homeowners are concerned not only with their property's eco-friendliness, but its overall cost effectiveness, too, it is important to talk to a professional before you decide to upgrade. Though certainly both geothermal and solar power are suitable for nearly every area of the country, variation in drilling difficulty and fluctuating levels of sun exposure from place to place means that the benefits of installing one of these systems needs to be taken on a case by case basis. Only a professional can tell you the specific costs and benefits for your property, and how well the pros and cons will stack up for your particular situation!
Rumor and reality rundown for the soon-to-be unstealthed fuel cell miracle worker
After almost a decade of development and hundreds of millions in investment, Bloom Energy is coming out.
Until now, all we've been able to garner were "no comments" from their marketing people. But this weekend, there's a Bloom piece airing on 60 Minutes that will feature none other than Greentech Media editor-in-chief Michael Kanellos. And next week is the official press conference and unveiling.
Over the years, we've heard news and rumors on Bloom that included:
That customer list is certainly impressive, as is the alleged backlog. And the PPA model really could impact their business model with the firm becoming an electricity supplier as well as a fuel cell supplier.
According to the CBS News article:
Stahl is the first journalist to be allowed into the Bloom Energy lab and factory where currently one box a day is built. The boxes create electricity by a chemical process that utilizes oxygen and fuel, but involves no combustion. Bloom's founder and CEO, K.R. Sridhar, insists all the materials in the box are cheap and available in abundance. Bloom says each large box - which can power about 100 homes - currently sells for $700-800,000. They hope within five to 10 years to roll out a smaller home version for about $3,000 a unit.
John Doerr, the Kleiner Perkins partner who invested in Bloom, has high hopes. "The Bloom Box is intended to replace the [electric power] grid for its customer," says Doerr. He thinks existing utility companies should not be threatened or have a problem with Bloom Energy. "The utility companies will see this as a solution. All they need to do is buy Bloom Boxes, put them in the substation for the neighborhood and sell that electricity," he says.
But there is another hurdle says Michael Kanellos, editor-in-chief of Greentech Media. Even if Sridhar can mass produce his boxes and sell them cheaply enough, "The problem is then G.E. and Siemens and other conglomerates that can probably do the same thing. They have fuel cell patents," he tells Stahl.
A little patent searching by Mr. Kanellos yielded:
In the fuel cell mode, the methane fuel is delivered to the SORFC anode where it is reformed into hydrogen and carbon monoxide, while oxygen or air containing oxygen is delivered to the SORFC cathode. In the fuel cell mode reaction, the hydrogen and carbon monoxide are converted to water and carbon dioxide which are discharged from the SORFC and preferably stored. Because the reformation of methane during the discharge cycle is highly endothermic, only about half of the heat is generated in the overall system as would have been produced using a hydrogen fuel input. The SORFC generates power during the fuel cell mode.
And:
The present inventors have also realized that the electrochemical system produces valuable byproducts in addition to electricity and hydrogen. The byproducts can include production, consumption, and/or temporary storage of heat, methane, carbon dioxide, oxygen, and water. Carbon dioxide and/or other carbon containing gases emitted in a fuel side exhaust of a SORFC system of a second preferred embodiment operating in the fuel cell mode may be captured and stored rather than vented into the atmosphere. This improves the environmental friendliness of the SORFC system.
Lots more information in the patent disclosures links.
Fuel cells have a 150-year history and the science is well understood. Solid Oxide Fuel Cell technology, Bloom's focus, is also not a new concept.
What has always been vexing, though, is understanding how to make money from a commercial fuel cell business. Very few firms, if any, have done that consistently. If Bloom has figured that out, then their take on distributed energy generation gets very interesting. And the wait just might have been worth it.
From the swing on Rick Nichols' wood-floored porch he can see the change. Across the intersection from his $460,000, plantation-style home there's a $250,000, tract-style home going up.
Other residents in some middle- and upper-range subdivisions across the Lowcountry are in the same spot: They paid premium price for their homes during the building boom and saw their property values plummet during the real estate crash while builders quit building.
Now, as developers scale back to find loans and buyers, builders are returning to some of these unfinished neighborhoods to construct homes that are smaller or less expensive.
It's happening at Fieldview, where Nichols lives; at The Ponds, a "master planned community" in Summerville; at Carol Oaks, a small subdivision in Mount Pleasant; at Carolina Bay in West Ashley; and at Baker Plantation in North Charleston, among others.
Residents are worried the new houses will further hurt their property values, but real estate pros say it would be worse to quit building.
"The worst thing for their neighborhood and the value of the neighborhood would be for it to sit stagnant," said Kimberly Boyd, the sales and marketing manager for Manorhouse Builders of South Carolina, which is developing Fieldview.
Some developers are using the voting shares they hold as majority owners of unsold property to rewrite covenants they previously established that govern what kind of homes can be built, and sometimes building at little more than half the price of previous construction. It's changing the look and appeal of the neighborhoods.
In some cases, the homes being built largely are the same as the homes already built, but some features have been removed to make the houses more affordable.
At Fieldview, the builder has turned to a different style of homes with fewer features and sold lots to D.R. Horton, a national company known for tract-style homes.
In September 2009, developers of The Ponds in Summerville brought in Harbor Homes to begin building houses starting from $277,000 after meeting to explain the move with uneasy community members who had bought homes starting at $330,000. The developers now are ready to bring in another builder for homes in the low $200,000 range, something that was planned to happen eventually in the original scheme.
"The market has shifted and we plan to remain ahead of the curve in giving customers the value they expect and deserve," John Morgan, community manager for Greenwood Communities and Resorts, said in a news release.
"There's been some anxiety," conceded Will Jenkinson, an agent with Carolina One Real Estate's new-home sales division that represents The Ponds among other developments. But it's in the builder's interest, he said, to construct a home that reflects the value of surrounding homes, if the builder wants it to sell.
"They're not coming in and cheapening the neighborhoods. I think once [residents] start seeing what they build, they'll be pleasantly surprised. It's better than having a dead-end neighborhood."
The worst part about it might be that residents and developers are in the same boat: Homes in tonier subdivisions no longer can sell for the money they used to. Developers are struggling to get financing.
"The homes aren't appraising," Boyd said. "We very much understand that this is a tough situation for all sides. But we want to survive, too."
After meeting with Fieldview residents and hearing Nichols' concerns, the developer, Hilton Smith III, has now assured them that business and appraisal values are picking up, and he will add features to make the new homes more attractive.
"We'd like to see a different style home," Nichols said, but he is sympathetic to the builder's plight. "He's a developer; he has a right to do it. He's done some nice things already on it. He is trying to work with the neighborhood."
Planning on building, buying or improving your home this year? Chances are you're thinking smaller, smarter and more family-centric.
"We continue to see a 'cents and sensibilities' approach when it comes to buying or improving a home," said Eliot Nusbaum, Better Homes and Gardens' executive editor for home design.
Nusbaum made the comment while presenting the results of the magazine's Next Home Survey at the National Association of Home Builders' International Builders Show in Las Vegas last month.
Here are some of the results of Better Homes and Gardens' Next Home Survey, and some of the trends that may influence new-home building and home-improvement projects in 2010:
87 percent of respondents said a greener, more-energy efficient home is a priority.
68 percent wanted an outdoor grilling and living area.
59 percent wanted a home office.
36 percent said their next home would be "somewhat smaller" or "much smaller."
75 percent said the economy has impacted their home-improvement plans.
52 percent said now is the time to spend on needed repairs and maintenance, rather than major home-improvement projects.
Source: Better Homes and Gardens
Baby boomer buyers fueled a big run-up in U.S. home construction and sales in the 1970s and 1980s.
Now beleaguered home builders say they're hoping aging boomers, who are just entering retirement age, will once again give them robust housing sales.
"We believe this segment of the market is going to lead the housing industry toward recovery as the market turns around," said Sharon Dworkin Bell, a senior staff vice president of the National Association of Home Builders.
What's out: Outdoor kitchens and fireplaces, two-story foyers and deluxe bathroom features such as multiple shower heads in the master bathroom.
What's in: Smaller homes with lots of natural light, storage and energy efficiency features that save money - and don't cost too much.
"Today's homeowner is also looking for a home that fits the entire family - from a multi-tasking home office, to expanded storage space, to a living room that can adapt to advancements in home entertainment and technology," said Nusbaum.
Later, speaking by phone from his office in Des Moines, Iowa, he said: "When someone says their highest priority is an efficient HVAC system, you know we're not living the same dream as three years ago. That dream was having a showplace home - a McMansion with the emphasis on two stories, big public spaces and an expensive fit-and-finish kitchen.
"Now, those things have drifted to the back burner. Today it's 'what I need' versus 'what I want.' People are being sensible and practical. They want low-cost improvements that pack a big punch," he said.
There were no major surprises in the survey results, "Though I thought it was interesting the number of people - 85 percent - who expressed a desire to have a separate laundry."
And Nusbaum was mildly surprised that 70 percent of those surveyed wanted low-maintenance landscaping, "when gardening is supposed to be America's top hobby."