Home > Blogs > 5 MORE Foreclosure Myths - BUSTED!
3,768,610 views

Ask Tara @Trulia

make smart decisions w/Tara's real estate + mortgage need-to-knows

By Tara-Nicholle Nelson | Broker in San Francisco, CA

5 MORE Foreclosure Myths - BUSTED!

Four years into the housing crisis, myths about foreclosure still litter the minds of even the smartest of real estate consumers. When it comes to matters as high stakes as your home, confusion can cost you thousands - or even your home. Whether you’re a buyer looking at foreclosures, a homeowner struggling to keep your home or a seller concerned making sure your home can compete with the foreclosed homes on your block, these foreclosure myths are prime for the busting, with no further ado.

Myth #1:  Foreclosure happens fast. With unemployment and underemployment still affecting nearly 1 in every 4 Americans, no one is immune from fears that a pink slip might quickly turn into a foreclosure notice.  According to NeighborWorks America, nearly 60 percent of families seeking foreclosure counseling cited a lost job or cut wages as the reason they were facing foreclosure. 

While the Obama Administration's Home Affordable Programs haven't been nearly as effective as predicted in actually preventing foreclosures, they have had the effect of extending the foreclosure process for many families.   Even though the legal process of foreclosure can happen in as few as 6 months in most states, it is currently taking much longer for the average foreclosure to get to completion.  Recently, JP Morgan Chase revealed that their average borrower who loses a home to foreclosure has not made any payments in 14 months nationwide; 22 months in FLorida and 26 months in New York.

To be sure, some see this as a good, others view it as unnecessarily dragging out the overall market's recovery. Many insiders will point out that these delays in foreclosure may be calculated to save the banks the costs of owning and maintaining foreclosed homes, not to help homeowners.  In any event, the fact that foreclosure does not happen nearly as fast, in many cases, as expected does give families who are temporarily down on their luck some extra time to try to get back on their feet and save their homes.

Myth #2:  Buyers can’t get clear title or title insurance on foreclosed homes.  When the foreclosure robo-signing scandal first hit, there was widespread concern that buyers would not be able to get clear title on foreclosed homes, because the former foreclosed owners might be able to come get their homes back when the improprieties in the bank's foreclosure documentation processes came fully to light.  At the same time, several of the country's largest title insurance companies publicly balked at issuing policies on bank-owned homes until the issue was resolved.  At this point, the banks claim they have revamped their processes, and all banks have stated that they have found not a single borrower whose home was repossessed without them having missed the requisite number of mortgage payments.  Nevertheless, a number of governmental investigations are still in progress.

The fact is, buyers of bank-owned properties in nearly every jurisdiction are protected from later title attacks by foreclosed homeowners by the bona fide purchaser rule, under which courts would prefer to simply award cash damages to be paid by the culpable bank to a wrongfully foreclosed-on homeowner, rather than reversing the sale or ownership to the new, innocent buyer.  Additionally, the title insurers have now changed their tune and restarted issuing insurance policies on bank-owned homes which protect buyers' interests, after working with the banks for them to take responsibility in the event a former homeowner prevails in a wrongful foreclosure suit. 

While there are still many intricacies of title to be resolved for foreclosure buyers who purchase homes at trustee sales and auctions, or for cash buyers who often went without title insurance in the past, on the average, Trulia-listed, bank-owned property purchased with an average mortgage and title insurance, the chances a buyer's title will later be successfully challenged by the foreclosed homeowner on the basis of robo-signing?  Exceedingly slim.

Myth #3:  Buyers should wait for the shadow inventory to be released.  Many a buyer, discouraged with the homes they see on the the form in their price range, has decided to sit still and wait for the banks to release for sale what is called their "shadow inventory" - rumored to be anywhere from 4 to nearly 6 million homes that have already been foreclosed, but not listed for sale, or will be foreclosed in the near future. The fact is, to the extent that the banks have acknowledged the existence of a pool of homes they own but are not selling, they have expressed that their reasoning for holding the homes off the market is to avoid flooding the market and driving home values down any further.  For that reason, buyers should not expect to see a massive influx of these shadow homes onto the market anytime soon - if ever. 

The banks' current modus operandi is that as they sell a home, the replace it with another home in that market - if they sell 50 homes in a town that month, they'll put another 50 on the next.  So, don't hold your breath waiting for a fabulous new flood of homes.  Instead, set up a Trulia alert to notify you when homes that fit your search criteria come on the market, and be ready to call your agent and go visit any and every one that looks like it might be a good fit.

Myth #4:  If you’re looking for a deal, you’re looking for a foreclosure.  Despite what they may say, no buyer’s heart's fondest desire is to buy a foreclosure.  But almost every buyer dreams of buying a great home - and getting a great deal on it.  Many people think that to get a great value on their home on today's market, it means they must buy a foreclosure.  As a result, the value and other advantages of buying an individually-owned home on today's market are frequently overlooked.  Individual sellers with homes on the market right now are generally quite motivated, and understand that their homes are competing with discounted short sales and foreclosed homes.  Many of these sellers are slashing prices in an effort to get them sold - the most recent Trulia Price Reduction Report revealed that 27 percent of homes on the market across the country have had at least one price reduction.  Now that's what I call a sale!

Further, individual owners are often much more negotiable on a wide range of contract terms than a bank which owns a foreclosed home.  You can work with non-bank owners on things like repairs, closing dates, choice of escrow provider, closing costs and even included personal property much more flexibly than you can when the bank is on the other side of the bargaining table.  On top of that, many individually-owned homes are in pristine, move-in condition; that is much rarer with foreclosures.  So, don't underestimate the value of the deal you might be able to get on a non-foreclosed home.  Just get clear on what you can afford and look at all the homes that are available in that price range, without discriminating against non-foreclosures.

Myth #5: Having a foreclosure on your credit history means it'll take years and years before you can buy again.  One of the most Frequently Asked Questions in the Trulia Voices Community by homeowners who are facing or have just lost a home through foreclosure is how long it will take before they'll be able to buy again.  Until recently, the standard wisdom was that 5 years, minimum, would have to have elapsed between the foreclosure and the new home purchase.  Now, though, borrowers can obtain an FHA loan with the low, 3.5 minimum down payment requirement as soon as 3 years following a foreclosure.  To do so, though, all your other ducks must be in a row. 

Post-foreclosure buyers need a credit score of 620-640 to qualify for an FHA loan; higher for a non-FHA loan - given that the foreclosure itself usually dings anywhere from 100-150 points off the credit score (not necessarily counting a full year or more of pre-foreclosure missed payments), former homeowners who want to buy again need to ensure they have no other late payments or credit dings after they lose thier home.  You must have clean credit with no derogatory marks like late credit card payments following the foreclosure,  and you may also be required to document 12 to 24 months straight of on-time rent payments after the foreclosure. 

Further, the bank may impose a lower debt-to-income ratio on post-foreclosure borrowers than on borrowers who have not had a foreclosure, in an effort to keep your mortgage payments low, keep you from overextending yourself and boost the chances you'll be a successful homeowner over the long-term this time around.  The bank will also need to see 2 years of continuous employment history in the same field, and documentation that you meet other loan qualification requirements.


P.S. - You should follow Trulia and Tara on Facebook, too!

Comments

By Jorge Muralles,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 04:26
Excellent article, it should really help buyers understand the bigger picture regarding bank owned homes.

I work as a real estate consultant in RI and can help anyone interested in this segment of the market.

ripropertyvalues.com


Jorge Muralles

jorgemuralles.com
By Russ Wilson,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 04:38
Just be careful of what you read here, both article and comments, since it is very high level and not always correct for every area of the country and more specifically in every market. This is an individualized situation - not a cookie cutter application.
By Russ Wilson,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 04:38
Just be careful of what you read here, both article and comments, since it is very high level and not always correct for every area of the country and more specifically in every market. This is an individualized situation - not a cookie cutter application.
By Suzy Lee, Realtor,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 05:14
Good article - very informative. As a Realtor in the great state of Minnesota - I find there's allot of fear and caution holding home buyers back. Fear they'll buy a home now that will continue to loss value - caution that they'll miss a great deal if they buy too soon. Russ may be correct in his statement above - but you have to admit - busting these 5 myths is a very good thing and more apt to be true than not.
By Haley Weaver,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 05:15
This is a VERY well written article with a lot taken into consideration. Of course, as the Realtor national campaign says "every market is different" but let's give the girl props for a job well done! I actually didn't know that banks were holding on to properties to avoid a shadow market (although that could be different in my market). Anyway, I just wanted to say "Excellent Job!"
By Pam Keen,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 05:22
This is great article and I will share it!
By Rebecca Cummings,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 05:34
So true Russ. Though we have had foreclosures in our market here in Pinehurst, NC the banks are not holding on to any inventory for fear of flooding the market. The market, just like the weather is different in every part of the country. Call an agent who knows and understands the foreclosure process in your town.
By B.J. Deal,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 05:36
Those who are 6 plus months behind will tell you that the mortgage company refused to take any payment after a missed payment unless it included the entire amount due making it impossible for them to catch up. They refuse to add that missed payment/s to the end of the loan or to negotiate a repayment plan for the missed payment. One missed payment, in most cases, caused the multiple missed payments. The programs issued by the Obama plans have not been used correctly and have only rewarded the lenders for their bad behavior. Now they want to give them more money with no stipulations attached! Please, somebody in Washington, talk to some Realtors to find out what the borrowers need to stop this massacre!
By Carl,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 05:47
A great and informative article. As a person looking to buy a home in Florida, I think Tara was right on the mark describing the realities in real estate buying, especially in this current market.
Well done Tara.
By Barbara Murphy,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 05:55
Thanks for the great article and insights, Tara. Here in the Northwest Florida Panhandle, there are many excellent home values to be found -- both in the foreclosure category as well as the non-distressed sale. A professional REALTOR will advise their Buyer of current valuations and help them negotiate their best deal. When we help our Buyers find a home that best fits their lifestyle -- everyone wins. Thanks for "Busting the Myths" that have some of our Buyers needlessly waiting on the sidelines. :)
By Gb,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:12
For you greedy flippers (that help create this disaster), look for a tax deed sale, the bank and condo gets nothing-all their liens null and void -- and you can pick up a condo/house for practically nothing. I live in FL - and it is being done in our building. I'm trying to sell my only home and resent these fire sales. And yes, O has not helped this situation. Banks need to get these properties moving and off the books and allow fair market value to come back.
By Barbara Mei,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:19
Buyers who are looking for short sales or foreclosures are short sighted.
Everyone whats a deal but purchasing a residence that is foreclosed or has been approved for a short sale represents a nightmare.
There are many residences that are priced in the same range as the short sales and foreclosures that eliminate a plethora of time and frustration. Instructing your buyers is key. You might also want to tell them that not going through the hassle is worth a little more. Time is money.
By Jack Lewitz,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:20
Nice job Tara. We should all be aware of these myths and I am sure many more to come in this real estate market.
By Suzanne Shull McCarty,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:36
Thank you for such informative facts, Tara. Knowledge is power ~ I just posted this to Facebook.
By Aaron Mtuanwi ASSOCIATE BROKER,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:37
This is a great follow-up.
By Glen Godlonton,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:42
Great information
Glen Godlonton
http://www.godlonton.com
By Helen Oliveri,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:43
Excellent post as always Tara. There still seems to be a big misconception on foreclosures out there and how they work, this post touches on some of those issues.
By Kenneth Fisher III,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:55
Great Article Tara,
Very informative. Of course, as its been said, every market is different. I haven;t really thought about it too much, but that certainly applies to the way the banks are approaching the foreclosure situation in different areas. Here, in Wilmington, NC, there are bank owned properties being held off the market. I'm not sure what the exact reason is (whether the bank is trying to avoid flooding the market, or not). I've come accross multiple homes that have already been assigned to real estate companies, and have their contact info on the door, but the agents are not allowing the properties to be shown until they officially hit the market.???

Its also interesting to see the average time it takes for banks to complete the foreclosure process in different states. States have different laws about the procedure, and each case is unique. It may take 12 months for one, and only 6 for another.. but it seems that delaying is largely a strategic way to: minimize risk and costs associated with holding property, and to avoid flooding the market. There are so many factors it can make your head spin. I'd like to think at least a small part of it is a result of the banks trying to work with owners. 26 months in New York...WOW.

Thanks for the good read Tara.
By Jim Simms,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 06:56
Hi Tara, Always like your articles and this is another good one! You would be surprised what I hear from people that have misconceptions about financing a home. As you mentioned above, we can fund loans when the borrower’s credit score is below 640, however, the lower they go the less wiggle room. At 620 not only do the ducks need to be in a row, the support documentation must be perfect as well. One huge problem that I see over and over is rental verification. Keep copies of all of the cancelled rent checks and or bank statements, see below (I copied from our book). As you can see, even the type of landlord can have an impact on the process.

Just last week I spoke with a lady that paid her rent in cash to a landlord that was not a professional management company. No way to verify her rental payments. In fairness this was compounded by the fact that she wanted to buy the home she was renting.

I copied and pasted the information below straight from our underwriting manual, keep in mind this is OUR underwriting guidelines, not FHA. The FHA book sets the minimum standards; every lender may have higher levels and usually do based on how they fund the loan. We fund using our own money and sell the loans to investors later. The layers that are higher than the FHA minimums are required by the investors we sell the loans to.


Scores < 640
Borrowers with scores < 640, regardless of the AUS findings, will not be eligible for financing if they have any of the following characteristics:

Debt To Income at 50% or greater.

Alternative trades will NOT be allowed (must have a minimum of 3 open AND active trade lines with a 12 month history).

Bankruptcy CH 7 & 13 must be 2 years from the discharged date.

Foreclosures must be 3 years from the completion date.

Scores from 620-639 will require an adjustment to price of (.500).

No late payments allowed in the last 12 months.

No collections, except medical, allowed in the last 12 months.

All collections must be paid with the exception of medical, at the underwriter’s discretion.

Documenting rental history - If the borrower is currently renting, the rental history must be verified. Rental references on the credit report are acceptable if a rating is provided. A minimum of 12 months must be verified via cancelled checks and/or bank statements if renting from an individual or VOR if completed by management company.
By Mike Netzel,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 07:01
Way to go! This highly wildly impactful event in peoples lives is the topic of so much misinformation.
Written well, short, to the point, Once given the factual consequence of a choice, people are free to make one and move on.
Seems any decision is better than no decision, since indecision is what drives people crazy.
By John Crowe,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 07:16
Good stuff.
By Janet Willison,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 07:22
Informative post! I will share this on my Facebook page. Hopefully as they news gets out this will help existing homeowners realize that is possible to purchase again in shorter time as previously indicated and new homebuyers will get off the shelf and purchase a home.
By Carol Zelonis,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 07:39
Good article, needs to be applied to what we already know for our areas. BJ you are so right, the banks are sending payments back to foreclosed individuals. They must pay all. So when the banks say they haven't paid in 12 months that is not always the case. Also, when they go through the HOPE program the cleints are told not to pay anything untill they get their modification.
By Randy & Janet Harris,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 07:44
Educating my Buyers about the reality of foreclosures has been my best tool for selling first time buyers.
By RJ Laffins,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 07:44
Always appreciate your wisdom Tara. Thank you. I reposted your article on my Distressed Homes blog.
Best, RJ
By Sue,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 08:45
If a current owners credit score will be damaged the same with either a foreclosure or short sale - and - if either way they can purchase a new home in 3 years ~ what is the true benifit of doing a short sale?
By Peter Teatai Ariki,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 08:50
B.J. I totally agree with you on the banks failure or should I say disregard in implimenting the government foreclosure prevention measures. We all know the answer to that. Banks are in the business to make money not handouts.

Lets take the case of B of A who bought out COUNTRYWIDE and ONE WEST BANK who bought INDY MAC. Both banks bought out these two banks at significant discounts. Here's how the deals were structured with the FDIC. The FDIC sold the notes at huge discounts. One of the conditions were that B of A and ONE WEST BANK can foreclose a home on the original note amount and not on the discounted amount which they bought them for. From a numbers stand point, a $400,000 original note from COUNTRYWIDE sold for $280,000 to INDY MAC, a 30% discount. When INDY MAC forecloses on a home, they foreclose on the original note of $400,000 and not $280,000. Now where is the justice here. This is really illegal in my view. Shouldn't the government have made it a requirement for INDY MAC to then restructure these notes at prevailing market rates. They could have but they didn't, which in my view goes to prove that the bail out was a mirage structured to hand our tax money out to the banks.

Now let's look at the players in the game. INDY MACs case Paulson was the key architect of the deal, and guess what? it's the same Paulson who also is part owner of ONE WEST BANK. Now tell me if this is first of all not a ARMS LENGTH transaction, second of all, double dipping, and worse case of all a SCAM!!!!

My question here is where's the homeowners bail out?and wouldn't it been cheaper and easier to restructure these loans at these discounted amounts? Absolutely, and it would not have cost anybody a dime. Unfortunately, the people involved in the deal makings are all connected and it's all about their pockets.

Now lets look at the other bank SCAM which was the cause of this whole real estate debarcle. Collateralized Debts known as CODs, where loans were packaged, securitized and sold to investors as blind pools. The loan packages were primarily OPTION ARMs and ALTA-A loans. There were three layers of risks to these COD investments and as such the same three layers of investors. The banks takes the very top layer with the least risk and the Hedge Funds, Mutual funds, Private Investors, etc, takes the very bottom layer which is the highest risk but the most profitable. Now during the boom times of 2001-early 2005 these were the Wall Street Hot investment commodities, until mid 2005 when the people who started this whole CDO thing realized that it was structured to be doomed and opted out of CDO investmenting. Now the banks started to realized that also but were stuck with the investments, so they began inside selling....yes, amongst themselves and in within the same company most times and made huge profits, and all for their bonuses ..isn't this illegal by the way?.

Then in 2007 it all came crashing down as homeowners started defaulting on their OPTION ARM loans, then in 2008 the ALTA-A loans followed. Now those private CDO investors are going after the banks for selling blind CDO pools as well as security frauds associated with the investment.

Now what comes to light for me here is this, if banks, and I would include the Federal Reserve Banks, purposely promoted these toxic loans primarily with the intent of making huge profits in the CDO investments, then they would have known or anticiapated this disasterous event. If such was the case, then should they not be required by Federal Government requirements, (if any) to remedy what they had caused the consumer. Or are they going to just either turn a blind eye and blame the market, or keep bailing the banks and Wall Street out. If such is to be the case, then I would have to say that "IT'S NOT A CRIME IF YOU ARE A BANK OR WALL STREET" or, most appropriately, " CRIME PAYS WELL IF YOU ARE A BANK OR WALL STREET"
By Zachary Widdes,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 09:02
Great Article, was just disucssing point number 5 with a friend yesterday that is trying to decide to do with his home. Sent him the information to help him with his decision.
By Isaac Bensussen,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 09:09
Well written and very informative article Tara. A note. We all know that homes that are foreclosed are in almost every case, people that did not make their mortgage payments and their home was foreclosed because of this. Nevertheless, I believe that the importance of presenting the right documentation to the Courts every time is of utmost importance. If Banks don't exhibit your signed note and signed trust deed, I believe that legally they don't have the right to foreclose. They better look for those documents before proceeding. The law has given lenders too much power. In California you could lose your home theoretically in 3 months and 21 days. In other countries and other states you have to sue the borrower in Court and prove that you have the right to take the home away. The foreclosure process is traumatic enough for most people in trouble that they should have at least, the benefit of the doubt and the right legal process, and why not, maybe during that lenghty process their luck can change and they would be able to cure their default and not lose their homes. Only an opinion. I am not an attorney.
By Rob E. Kirchner,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 09:13
Interesting, however, there wasn't any mention of how Short Sales effect or are effected by Foreclosures. For instance, the article compared the benefits of buying a "non-bank owned property" with a foreclosure. However, a "non-bank owned property" is defined as a traditional regular sale -no mention of Short Sales. It would have been interesting to see a comparason of Foreclosure vs. Regular Sales vs. Short Sales. Here in Reno, of 50% of our listed property are Short Sales.
By Gary J. Tippner,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 09:15
Another great article by Tara!
Trulia, I hope you pay her enough!
Thanks Tara, your articles help me become a more educated Realtor, and that helps me in the eyes of clients.
Gary Tippner
http://www.callgarytoday.com
By Anne Hatch,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 09:16
Thanks for the great article. I will share it.
By John Santana,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 09:21
Great article, very informative. Like Russ mentioned "not always correct for every area of the country". Please check with your local REALTOR or go online and check current information for your City and State.
For those buyers who are looking for a great deal and think it is only going to be found in a Forclosure. Let me share this, I work as a REALTOR here in Southern California and have observed and sold many homes ( REO - BANK OWNED / SHORT SALE / STANDARD SALE / PROBATE) and what I can report is that each home or property type needs to be considered on a One on One Basis. These properties all have a value and can all be from Excellent condition to Very Poor condition no matter what type of sale. I have seen great deals on all these types of properties and I have also seen them all overpriced. Be sure you are working with a knowledgeable REALTOR who can guide you and protect you every step of the way.
Most buyers and sellers are wanting the best deal but we all need too understand that every home has a VALUE and that's were your local REALTOR can help you out.

Prudential Realty
JOHN SANTANA
JohnSantana4Homes@Yahoo.com
By Brad,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 09:33
Great info. Thanks for sharing!
By American Consumer,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 10:03
Interesting article and comments.

I've been trying to buy a house for several years, Hmm.. over 8 years, excellent FICO, Pre-approved for much more than what good sense allows me to pay for a roof on my head and my family's head, without extending my means to be vulnerable to normal life mishaps. I wondered how people can get themselves in such a huge dept load and call themselves home owners. Buying a house is part of the American Dream, Proud of ownership. Realtors used this to their extreme benefit to push homes and make commissions, how can we trust them?
Banks now, in my whereabouts, are keeping their disturbed home inventory in purgatory. Some just keep the property with its non-paying (so called) owners for years and offer the over inflated price on a short sale, that is, to try to avoid community penalties for bank owned abandoned properties, and some foreclose and rent out through a real-estate company, some just foreclose and keep away. Banks are doing all they can to trickle their inventory to the market to avoid a sudden drop in property values, perhaps that is to keep current owners in their homes, as they do not want them to think, and some of them do, that they own a property that they are servicing its loan that is more than its current value. And the owners that bought their homes as a retirement asset, or a rental/investment asset. That is all understandable.

I had to sell my house, about 10 years ago, in a hurry, with a loss, cause I knew that I would not be able to afford the mortgage payments when I have to move elsewhere for another job. Other folk kept their properties and had to foreclose or other bad outs. I considered myself lucky to have been able to do that.

Now I see around me properties with over inflated values, The system is using my tax money against me to buy a roof on top of my head. Until I see reasonable value that I would not have to feed my family beans and afford to pay for my car repairs if and when it breaks down to be able to go to work. The Banks and real-estate investors (local and foreign) can keep their properties.
By Mark Malave, Buyer's Agent,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 10:36
To American Consumer,

I don't know what market you live in, but here in Chicago the prices/interest are down to the point where you can buy and live for less than you can rent a similar property. It is my belief that simple inflation will push values up along with the fact that you have to live somewhere. Many people are willing to pay a small premium for the right to "own" and have the right to change things in their homes and have the stability of having a fixed mortgage that they can budget for in the future. Many of the housing problems were caused by short-term ARMs which did not provide the stability of a 15 or 30 yr fixed mortgage. It is a very complicated situation, and sometimes you have to cut your losses and move on to the next one. Real estate is still the easiest and most profitable investment you can make that will create a passive income with as little as 5% total investment. The numbers are just too good right now to pass up for investors in my market.
By Ron Tossell,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 10:43
Thanks Tara for your "myth busters". I have sent copies to all my prospective and current clients. Nothing can top education to help survive in this ever-more-complex world. And you've done an excellent job in educating by this article.
Ron Tossell, Realty ONE Group
rontossell@cox.net
By William Sowles,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 10:44
One thing to remember in this down market: Don not forget to watch out for a defiency judgement on your foreclosure. You can go to debitors prison for that....
By Stephanie Greer,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 11:06
William, in states like CA deficiency judgement is not an issue if the property was your primary residence and the loan was a purchase money loan. So for that reason we're experiencing a lot more strategic defaults that will keep our property values depressed and cause a slower economic recovery for our state. Not to mention a $25B budget deficit. But, I'm a lifer, so I'll tuff it out.

Stephanie Greer, Mainstreet Realtors
http://inlandempire-shortsaleblog.com
http://stopforeclosureinlandempire.info/
By Efren Herrera,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 11:08
The truth is here. Thanks for sharing this
By Kathleen Wilson,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 11:34
if you are doing a short sale with the deficiency wiped out for fannie mae and freddie mac the program is hamp another program for loan modifications is called hapa
By Molly Thompson,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 12:07
Thanks! Well written, worth sharing... matches my experience in Central Coast CA and Silicon Valley...
CHEERS!
By Paul Chadband,Rs, ABR,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 12:44
Very informative and together with the earlier artical "10 myths about buying Foreclosure give you the big picture. I am a Realtor in Hawaii on the Big Island. We have our fair share of REO's (bank owned properties). The process is nothing like the nightmare of the short sales properties sales. With current REO pricing the appraisals have coming in at a value that works for the buyers loan to value requirements.

If you would like to work with a Big Island Realtor experienced in this market and be able to preview of homes pending foreclosure prior even being listed on the MLS contact me. Paul Chadband Rs, Livingston Realty,
paulchadband@aol.com
By Julia St. Marie, ABR, RRG, RSPS,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 13:48
Excellent article.....
In Las Vegas....
REOs are selling very successfully in Las Vegas with no backlash of new buyer with a compromising title.
REO inventory is at 19% on the MLS....50% are short sales....the rest straight sales.
Any buyer whom makes a purchase in Las Vegas today is surely poised with a fabulous deal....as this fabulous city of Las Vegas aka One of the most exciting cities on this planet is "on sale."!!
By Savannah,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 13:54
This was a great and informative article. Thank you so much!
By Aaron Evans,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 14:44
Rob Kirchner is right.

At least 50% of the market is "short sales" or pre-foreclosure homes. Most sellers aren't going to take a loss, and aren't in a position to pay the difference in valuation, and the banks aren't budging.

This is the real "shadow inventory" and most of these properties are *really* for sale. It is the bank trying to get more out of the property before legally (or illegally) repossessing it.

It makes sense on the face value to try and short sell, avoiding potential property damage & neglect as well as the stigma. In truth, foreclosure isn't even a real foreclosure, and almost every auction is "bought" by the bank, with minimum bids frequently higher than the value of the note, and almost always above market value -- except where there are insider deals.

I'd estimate that probably 80% of "foreclosures" are yet to come, and are being held in limbo in the short sale market, where repossession can be delayed if an offer is made, but the current owners can still be vacated (as opposed to legally evicted), or at least convinced to do upkeep.

Still, with a 20% inflation built in over the next 9 months via "quantitative easing", and negative real interest (for banks), and no other reliable source of long term investment, a house that is still overpriced now might be the best way to hedge your investment. Taking a 20-30% loss on an overpriced, stagnant property over who knows how much otherwise could still be a sound investment. And who knows how long the lending markets (though relatively tight now) will stay open. You could be looking at minimum 20% down at 10%+ APR on a still stagnant market 2 years from now.

Putting money in the bank until the economy get's better is as much a suckers game as making regular contributions to your 401k.
By Joe Robaina, P.A.,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 15:24
While your article provides some interesting points of view regarding the different aspects and risks of buying REO properties, I think it fails to mention the potential advantages of focusing on pre-foreclosure properties.

I have chosen to specialize in short sales for many reasons, not the least of which is that I can offer the prospective buyer a real title insurance policy and often negotiate a price that is well below comparable values.

Also, the prospective buyers get the assurance that every offer will be presented to the seller so the process is not so much like an auction and in my opinion the short sale process these days does not take that much longer to close (30 to 60 days in most cases) and offers much more flaxibility and less time pressure on the buyer to perform inspections, get funding, etc.

Basically, other than for the extremely savvy buyer with substantial experience and resources to abosrb a bad buy with lots of surprises, I think the short sale market is a much safer bet.

Joe Robaina, Realtor, TRC
Realty World International Gateway, Inc.
1(800)792-3042
By Donna,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 18:27
...the article was very informative, but the comments were even better!
My husband and I live in New Jersey. We are simple people. We pay rent, lease our car and have a credit score averaging 695. This economy flipped us upside down like everyone else in 2008, but we have managed to start a business, in the worst time possible, and NEVER miss the rent payment. Never. The only mortgage I am offered is a 'non-verification' loan requiring 30% down. OK, we can put down 30% on a 200,000 mortgage and we have the closing fees. AND now, the banks want 'reserve'. SO, I will continue to pay someone else's mortgage and NOT buy my own place which is MORE than what my own mortgage would be. Something is wrong with this, but like all big business, there isn't anyone to talk reason. It's all numbers on a grid. Does anyone have some advise on this?!
By Brian R Thurman,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 22:34
Hey Gb, appears you are not very informed of real estate matters. As an agent and investor in Phoenix I saw countless home owners who thought their home was worth more than it's realistic value during the boom years. As I recall the vast majority of sales back then were not investors, but home owners who helped drive prices up. As an investor or property flipper, I get no more than market value just like any other real estate transaction in the neighborhood. In fact, of the 6 neighbors that have stopped by, 5 of them have told me they are happy someone finally came around and fixed up the crappy house on their street. So happy that they want me to get the one at the end of the block and get it looking as nice as the rest of the block. Do you think that has value to anyone besides the 20+ people that profit off my activities and $30-40k I pump back into our local economy for every transaction?
By Fredric,  Thu Nov 11 2010, 23:56
Good job on this article. I really like the info on the shadow inventory of homes that people expect the banks to release. Many of my buyers expect this to cause the prices to plummett and I am glad you set the record straight on this by making very valid points.
By Malinda Sutcliffe,  Fri Nov 12 2010, 06:36

Just saw a property which I know about--------the property was auctioned in late October-----a Realtor now has it listed in November and being advertised as fully refurbished. Fact, the home was not refurbished in two weeks by the new purchaser, known as an investor at auction. The home was refurbished by the owner.

Is this house being flipped? If so, this isn't free enterprize-------------this is pure greed.

Perhaps the writer would address the subject of 'flipping'---------is it illegal, is it legal?
By Ed Roumillat,  Fri Nov 12 2010, 07:48
Maybe I am just lucky as I have not encountered the circumstances quoted below. It's been my experience with a current lender that approval/disapproval of a buyers offer on a short sale property is made within 4 days.



"Buyers who are looking for short sales or foreclosures are short sighted.
Everyone whats a deal but purchasing a residence that is foreclosed or has been approved for a short sale represents a nightmare.
There are many residences that are priced in the same range as the short sales and foreclosures that eliminate a plethora of time and frustration. Instructing your buyers is key. You might also want to tell them that not going through the hassle is worth a little more. Time is money. .."
By Leo,  Sun Nov 14 2010, 04:40
The greed factor is high. Lets stereotype some here. Not to many common Joes can afford a home. Either the price of a home is too high or the income is too low.
The real estate market is similar to the current weather conditions. Meaning it changes from day to day, and may hold steady for a few days.
But in my opinion the housing market is due for a tremendous blow "beneath the belt" so to speak. Washington DC Inc. is planning to eliminate mortgage interest payments from annual tax deductions. If you havent read it, then you been avoiding it. Its real bad news for generations to come who will have to pay off our trillions of dollars in budgets and budget deficits.
By Malinda Sutcliffe,  Sun Nov 14 2010, 16:19
Leo

Agree this economic collapse is not finished..

Rather than the banks working with people as human beings they look at the homeowners and investors as ciphers to either be subtracted from the bank's balance sheet or added to their balance sheet.

The days of the friendly banker who knew the families who came to their banks are gone-------no longer are loans tailored to suit the individual or individual family. A lot of people got sucked in, scammed pehaps a better word, by the slick presentations-------------now those slick presenters are no where to be found.

With the precarious economy, each time that a short sale or foreclosure is done as one writer wrote today, another family is made homeless-----destabilizing the economy further------destablizing that particular family taking away their capacity to fucntion. to have an abode from which to participate in he economy.
By Laura Kelley,  Sun Nov 14 2010, 21:16
Thank you for Bloging!
By Norma Laine,  Mon Nov 15 2010, 19:51
Informative article. It further highlights the need for those interested in this segment of the market to contact a qualified Real Estate Professional. As a CDPE designated Realtor, I can help both buyers and sellers of distressed property anywhere in Orange County California
Norma Laine
RE/MAX Metro
http://www.OCDistressedPropertyDeals.info
By Eric P. Egeland, SFR, e-PRO, CDPE,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 06:09
Thanks for the post, there is some good info. I do want to note though that each local market is different & some areas are/will be more affected than others.
By Andrew Graham,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 06:26
Great Article, Very Informative. Thanks for sharing!
By Ozzie Hayes,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 06:34
Thanks for this great article. I am posting it on my Face Book Page.
By Clark Riel,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 06:44
Tara I always find your blogs informative. Thanks
By Luciano J. Ercolini,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 06:44
I've dealt with a number of buyers who wish to buy short sale or reo's. They come to the table with unrealistic price expectations. They wish to submit offers thirty to fifty percent off list. Or...they wish to make many offers on short sales and then....cancel all the rest.

It's a mess and I select those type of clients very carefully!!!
By Ian Gray,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 06:50
This is an article I will keep for reference!
By Voices Member,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 07:54
Good article, Tara! I've had plenty of buyers come to me saying they want a foreclosure because they think it's going to be the deal of the century. I try to explain that someone who hasn't made the mortgage payments in over a year, most likely couldn't afford to fix the leaky faucet or replace the worn out carpet. But someone somewhere told them they could get a $400,000 home for $100,000 by buying a foreclosure, so I have to take them to see some and show them that they are buying a $100,000 that needs $200,000 worth of work. Yes, it probably will still work out to be a good deal over the long-term, but you're going to have to put a lot of work into it and most people don't want to put that kind of work into their new home.
By Donna Chorey,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 07:54
Good article. I am a Realtor in Las Cruces, NM and we are seeing our "solds" having more and more foreclosed properties ( around 22% of solds last month). We are also seeing more bank owned and short sale properties in our inventory. I am a Certified Distressed Property Expert and can assist both sellers and buyers on distressed properties issues. Donna Chorey, Assoc. Broker, Re/Max Classic Realty, 575-640-1332 . Email: dmchorey@comcast.net. http://www.donnachorey.com
By *Jim Manning*,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 08:10
Great article. We specialize in helping people stop foreclosure in Saint Louis and St Charles Missouri. Call Jim Manning at 314.571.9225 or visit http://www.stlforeclosureexpert.com
By - Rick Dillion - Local Expert,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 08:21
Good article but for those thinking of walking out of an upside down equity situation think of the possiblities: If an investor (landlord) you might face tax consequences from the IRS and the lender or lenders (if more than one) might sue you for the difference owed and the amount sold. Aways consult an attorney and a tax specialist before you take rash action. Your agent can help you with a short sale and real estate needs but can not advise you on tax matters nor legal matters.
By Jeffrey Barkstall,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 09:16
Good article. In my area of Champaign -Urbana Illinois there are lenders who are holding on to properties waiting for the market to get "better" The thing for people to understand is there are severl options available for home owners to stop forclosure. I try to help families before they lose thier homes. http://www.JeffreyBarkstall.com or 217-352-4288 ext. 54
By Mobius Nemesis,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 09:23
When people ask me what happened to America I tell them "Americans." The banks are stealing America home by home, its no different than the teorrists sneaking into your home killing your family, then moving on to the next one. What kind of slime bag would purchase a home stolen from a family. If no one would buy foreclosed homes and everyone refused to do business with banks America might survive thie attack by the bankers. But stupid people listen to moronic journalists and slimy real estate agents. Wake the hell up. You can have liberty or you can have bankers, you cannot have both.
By Ron & Diana Dahlberg,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 09:35
Tara ... Thanks for the great article and insight. I practice real estate in southeastern Wisconsin. We have many great homes and values all around us -- in foreclosure, short sale and non-distressed homes. We must be constant in staying abreast of our marketplace and when we keep our clients "informed" -- it's a Win/Win proposition. Thank you again for keeping us in the KNOW by "Busting the Myths" that have crippled many Buyers by needlessly waiting on the sidelines.
By Cherimie Crane & Associates,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 09:44
Tara, thank you so much for such an informative article After reading, I called three different clients that this directly impacts. Thank you for helping me keep my clients up to date!!! http://www.BeaufortTime.com
By Leo Vekslin,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 09:45
Nice job! Will definately share with my clients.
By Jeff Adams,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 10:36
If I stepped into this article, I'd have to spend the rest of the day scraping it off of my shoe.

Myth 1 – the timeframe to go from being served notice to actual foreclosure varies wildly by state, so any blanket statement about the national trend doesn’t mean anything. And by looking at averages, you wipe out the extremes. It is entirely possible for one homeowner to be foreclosed on in 6 months and have the state average be 14 months; you just need another homeowner for whom the foreclosure took 22 months. Looking at the mean time would be more statistically significant.

Myth 2 – Why should we believe the banks have cleared up their mess when they’re the ones (with the collusion of Wall Street bond traders) who created the mess in the first place, by loaning so much money to people who didn’t meet their minimum lending standards? I’ve read of lenders selling bundles of subprime loans to bond traders where 40% of the loans didn’t meet their minimum standards to get a subprime loan. And somehow these loans were bundled into double and triple-A rated bonds. This behavior is the most perfect example I can think of for diligent government regulation of financial markets, and not the fig leaf of regulation that they currently operate under now. It has always been the case that occasionally people who couldn’t afford a home were somehow able to get a loan; our housing crisis and associated economic crisis was precipitated when the banks and Wall Street specifically made their business model the creation exotic loan packages and ignoring common sense lending standards, with the intent of lending to the poorest and least credit worthy people in our country, while never considering what would happened when the teaser interest rate when up by 33% and home prices stopped increasing. (To clarify – if your teaser rate was 6% and it goes up by 2% at the end of two years, that is a 33% increase in your interest rate.) Also, your answer that buyers would be protected by the “bona fide purchasers rule” sounds to me like there is still a good chance you could end up in court, which wouldn’t be without cost, even if the buyer successfully defended their purchase. Additionally, this wouldn’t be assured, because each judge can decide a case based on their perception of the specific merits of the case. Furthermore, even if the past record indicates that the buyer and not the wrongly foreclosed homeowner would win, there haven’t been any test cases related to this specific fraudulent behavior of the banks.

Myth 3 – While you may be right that the banks “MAY” be smart enough (in spite of recent evidence that they are not at all smart) to not release a flood of foreclosed homes onto the market, the effect of releasing a trickle of foreclosures every single month will continue to exert downward pressure on prices. While home buyers may not want to wait for a flood that won’t happen, if they want to wait for prices to hit bottom, waiting until this shadow inventory is near to hitting rock bottom is a sound strategy.

Myth 4 – This is the only one I agree with, over all, although being able to negotiate terms isn’t the same as getting a lower price. You didn’t answer the actual strategy I have to respond to when working with a buyer looking at a foreclosure. There is a perception that banks will consider offers of 50% (or more) off of the asking price, and while this is occasionally the case, it is more common for a foreclosure to sell above the asking price because the aggressive pricing strategy of the bank to sell the home already reflects a significant discount from the competitive, non-foreclosure , market price.

Myth 5 – Your answer confounds logic. You start with the “myth” that it would take years for someone with a foreclosure to be able to buy a home again and your answer is no, it’ll take 3-5 years. Is three to five years not years?
By Doug Reynolds,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 13:19
I felt it was a good article. Thanks Tara. Keep up the good work.
By Linda Rengel,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 13:33
Definitely right on the money and applicable to many major markets. Thank you Tara for condensing it so well.
By Maggie Reese,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 14:22
This was a good article for clients. For those who responded that it was simplified, I would suggest that part of the cause of the housing problems we are now facing is that we did not speak in simple enough terms for the buyers to understand. How many clients have you heard say that they did not know their loan payment could increase by so much? I have had clients tell me they did not know they had an interest only loan!! Reality is, buying a home and figuring out mortgage information is NOT a simple process. And we did not do a good job of making sure that everyone really understood what was possible. Thirty years ago when I was a mortgage banker, every borrower was shown and provided with a worst-possible scenario pay-back schedule. Not a single person I talk to today was ever given that example.

As for the terrible investors, of which I am one, we are buying properties and fixing them up so that the people who can no longer afford to live in the homes they bought have somewhere decent and affordable to rent. Has it not occurred to anyone that since they can't buy, they MUST rent, and if no one buys the foreclosed and short-sale properties, the prices on existing rental inventory will go through the roof?

I have a friend who will tell you that the best thing that happened to his family was foreclosure. They struggled for years to pay an ever-expanding mortgage, trying to provide for their kids, keeping two decrepit vehicles running because they could not afford a car loan. When they lost the home, they were devestated. But now, just four months later, in a rental that they can afford, in a nice area close the kid's schools, and with a little spare cash in their pockets, they wish they had let the darn thing go long ago.

PS I am short-selling a home I had intended to live in a long time until I got laid off. I down-sized and moved on, and am now helping my clients to do the same.
By J. Mario Preza, CRB, CDPE,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 15:05
Well, generally it seems most of the comments from esteemed colleagues were positive, and excepting some of the ever present naysayers, you've done a fine job of pointing out some of the oft ignored realities, even though, as one comment points out, it isn't cookie cutter, nor do all the same conditions hold true everywhere. There are some intricacies in this complex topic, but it probably would take a dissertation or even an "Idiot's Guide To Foreclosure" to cover as many as one can think up. But, that is another story for another venue. Overall, I do as much with anyone who wants me to review their situation -- be they buyers of foreclosures or hopeful sellers of houses that are under water. All the politics and issues of robo this or schemes of shady lending practices aside, a "traditional" foreclosure is as you've outlined, the consequences for some are in line with your premise, but not all cases and not all banks adhere to these standards. I have seen some lenders take as much as a year to conclude their foreclosure business (I heard from one individual who sought my help in the San Joaquin Valley who said he had been living in his house for nearly two years without paying and wondering how he should proceed, particularly because he had been in constant contact with his lender about his problems). As for buying, that is another story all together. There was a posting on Trulia from an unsuspecting "investor-type" who wound up bidding on a foreclosure only to discover that he "bought" a loan in second position and wound up with a house(?) where he still owed the balance of a much higher first mortgage that hadn't started the foreclosure (yet). It can get messy. Thanks for your well thought out explication, I'm sure it'll be well received by many who are still confused by this complex subject matter -- Realtors and the public alike.
By Marsha Bowen-Washington,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 19:02
Tara, nice article. There is such negative perception with some buyers that they should avoid short sales because of the duration it takes to get an approval. Along with other pros, the advantage of clear title is a big plus.
By Mark Aalto MLO #116708,  Tue Nov 16 2010, 22:13
FHA's rule for foreclosures is not "new." FHA has allowed financing within three years of a foreclosure since at least 1991 when I worked for FHA and quite a while before that. In addition, if a consumer can prove the foreclosure was caused by circumstances beyond their control a loan can sometimes be done in 2 years. If the loan that went into foreclosure was FHA; however, it will be 3 years from last date of action no matter what. These are the guidelines for FHA only. One thing that is really important to know is that the time frame is from the date of last action - not when the NOD is issued, not when the foreclosure process starts etc.

The big news in my opinion is with Fannie Mae - not FHA. Currently Fannie Mae is changing their timeframes post foreclosure from 5 to 7 years. Seven years is a long time and we are going to be impacted by this crisis for a long time.

I'd also like to point out that to us lenders a modification, short sale, deed in lieu and foreclosure are all treated like a foreclosure from the standpoint of eligibility for loans etc. A lot of sellers are going to be surprised when they realize that with a short sale they are going to be non-financeable for a number of years. (FHA does have some exceptions depending on the status of the loan at the time of the short sale but I don't see this being something very many lenders will offer). So be careful with the advice you give to sellers - in a lot of cases they would be much better off going through foreclosure. One comment to your article was that sellers have to worry about deficiency judgments with a foreclosure - it's short sales that bring the potential of deficiency judgments. Deficiency judgments have the potential of hanging over a consumer for 26 years - 6 years initially on a credit report with the creditor having the option of renewing the judgment 2 times at 10 years a pop. 3 years or 7 years is going to seem pretty short when compared to how long a deficiency judgment can linger. Again, we need to be really careful with the advice we are giving sellers.

Interesting times to say the least.
By NATIONAL LOAN COUNCIL,  Wed Nov 17 2010, 06:16
STOP FORECLOSURE GET HELP NOW!
National Loan Council
GOV;T PROGRAMS AVAILABLE FOR:
Loan Modifications, Short Sale Approval and REO Properties Available!
http://www.nationalloancouncil.us
By Wayne Pruner,  Wed Nov 17 2010, 10:57
This is a great article. I hope the general public reads it.
By Maurice Stewart,  Wed Nov 17 2010, 17:35
Thanks Tara,
We have another wave of homes coming over the hill; Mansions owned by professionals like Doctors, Attorneys etc. These million dollar homes are both primary and investment properties that were once affordable. It is not to say that these professionals are not making great income but the IRS has become their "Piper" as these folks were accustomed to refinance and pay the bill in the past. But, now things are different, the well is dry.
CPA's are having a field day as they restructure and recalibrate the financial screws for these once high-net worth individuals. As a matter of fact CPA's are great team players and can help realtors obtain listings of homes for short sales.
We have syncicated a group of professionals and we are never idle. Things are good.
Maurice Stewart (561) 202-7939
By Brandy Parker,  Thu Nov 18 2010, 06:58
Well written article! There are so many different points to purchasing a foreclosure that it is overwhelming to buyers...but there are GREAT deals out there to be had daily. I am lucky enough to work with a group of people that have simplified the process of purchasing foreclosure and non-insurable properties in the DFW area. The program is awesome! You can view their informative website at http://www.homeagaindfw.com
By Linda L Lear,  Thu Nov 18 2010, 10:34
Excellent article and very well written. Thanks. Linda Lear, Showcase Properties, Ocala, Florida.
By Ryan Gossett,  Thu Nov 18 2010, 12:00
1 sentence = busy agent.
5 paragraphs = not busy agent.

Great article!
By Donna Ferrell, Broker,  Mon Nov 22 2010, 20:05
This is the problem with myths, they keep going. #5 I find is the most common.
By Kennytanlaw,  Thu Nov 25 2010, 10:14
I'm a real estate attorney/broker. I've worked on foreclosure defense cases for many years.

If you do nothing, the foreclosure process will end quickly. But if you do something and try to fight it, it can take two years or longer in some cases. It varies.

There's a lot of truth about the fact that foreclosed properties are less well maintained by the owners. So be prepared to spend some money to fix up the place. Since you won't have the opportunity to look at the inside, you won't know what the actual conditions are to estimate the cost of repairs.

Getting title insurance is usually not difficult on a short sale. On a trustee's sale, it's a different story. I've had clients who bought properties at the trustee's sales only to receive notices of rescission from the trustees who said that they'd made a mistake.
By DAVID COOPER,  Fri Nov 26 2010, 02:19
A seasoned real estate agent with a lot of negotiated closings under his/her belt can acheive as good a price discount with a lot less stress and many more layers of protection in the regular real estate market than Bank Owned Foreclosures.
Taking over a property with no warranty, no guarantee or no professional inspection is like handing over your money to the next Bernie Madoff. You know deep in your heart it just doesn't make sense, but you do it anyway. Most foreclosure buyers tell you what a great deal they got at the piurchase price, but then start muttering when you asked how much did it cost to get the ready to live in, and how long did it take.

David Cooper 702-488-7037
http://www.lsvegaswinner.org
By Megous,  Thu Dec 2 2010, 06:16
You can choose a lender and mortgage, apply for the loan and get your mortgage approved on principle before you even start looking for a house. This means that you know what your budget will be and can be fairly certain that your mortgage will be accepted. The lender will still want to see the valuation survey, however, and there may be other checks that have to be completed before the deal is closed.
==============================
First Time Buyer Mortgages
By Honey Crenshaw,  Thu Dec 2 2010, 08:52
We just wanted to say thank you we loved your blog so much we borrowed it for our own blog...of course linking back to you, and giving you full credit at the very top of the page. Lots of great info here!
By Joseph Hollak,  Thu Dec 2 2010, 10:05
I've read that 45% of all homes in the U.S. are currently 'distressed properties.'

With numbers like those, there are bound to be plenty of myths floating around. Great post to help combat some of the bad news out there. Kudos.
Great job Tara!
By Pat and Steve Pribisko,  Sat Dec 4 2010, 12:57
Great article. What is frustrating to a Realtor is a Buyer who only wants only to look at bank REOs. The Buyers misses the homes that are in better condition & many times cost less when the deal is done.
By Andrew Weakland,  Wed Dec 8 2010, 10:58
Thanks for this article. So far in my search I have found it more effective to mention foreclosures in the area to motivated sellers who are not under duress than trying to deal with the nigthmare that is finding and viewing foreclosed homes.
By Patti Lyles,  Thu Dec 9 2010, 09:43
Fabulous article Tara. I got caught up in it and read about 20-30 comments and 1/2 hour passed. Time well spent because I learned a great deal. I will pass on.

I am a short sale specialist who has closed her 18 short sale file last month. Tough market but when you know the game it really help the consumer.
By Uncle_vito,  Tue Dec 28 2010, 19:22
Housing is going into a second dip. If buyers wait long enough, they will be able to buy a house in their price range (cheap).
By David G.,  Tue Jan 11 2011, 20:47
Hi, I wanted to comment on the foreclosing and trying to by again. My girlfriend and I applied at two institution in central NH, i have excellent credit 740s with little income because I'm self-employed for20 yrs. my girl friend has a great job with with a forecloser 5 yrs ago. we were denied because of the forecloser. we had better than a 20% down to. so I'd like to see the truth in the above information

POST

Contact Tara-Nicholle Nelson

 
Copyright © 2012 Trulia, Inc. All rights reserved.   |  
Have a question? Visit our Help Center to find the answer