Four years into the housing crisis, myths about foreclosure still litter the minds of even the smartest of real estate consumers. When it comes to matters as high stakes as your home, confusion can cost you thousands - or even your home. Whether you’re a buyer looking at foreclosures, a homeowner struggling to keep your home or a seller concerned making sure your home can compete with the foreclosed homes on your block, these foreclosure myths are prime for the busting, with no further ado.
Myth #1: Foreclosure happens fast. With unemployment and underemployment still affecting nearly 1 in every 4 Americans, no one is immune from fears that a pink slip might quickly turn into a foreclosure notice. According to NeighborWorks America, nearly 60 percent of families seeking foreclosure counseling cited a lost job or cut wages as the reason they were facing foreclosure.
While the Obama Administration's Home Affordable Programs haven't been nearly as effective as predicted in actually preventing foreclosures, they have had the effect of extending the foreclosure process for many families. Even though the legal process of foreclosure can happen in as few as 6 months in most states, it is currently taking much longer for the average foreclosure to get to completion. Recently, JP Morgan Chase revealed that their average borrower who loses a home to foreclosure has not made any payments in 14 months nationwide; 22 months in FLorida and 26 months in New York.
To be sure, some see this as a good, others view it as unnecessarily dragging out the overall market's recovery. Many insiders will point out that these delays in foreclosure may be calculated to save the banks the costs of owning and maintaining foreclosed homes, not to help homeowners. In any event, the fact that foreclosure does not happen nearly as fast, in many cases, as expected does give families who are temporarily down on their luck some extra time to try to get back on their feet and save their homes.
Myth #2: Buyers can’t get clear title or title insurance on foreclosed homes. When the foreclosure robo-signing scandal first hit, there was widespread concern that buyers would not be able to get clear title on foreclosed homes, because the former foreclosed owners might be able to come get their homes back when the improprieties in the bank's foreclosure documentation processes came fully to light. At the same time, several of the country's largest title insurance companies publicly balked at issuing policies on bank-owned homes until the issue was resolved. At this point, the banks claim they have revamped their processes, and all banks have stated that they have found not a single borrower whose home was repossessed without them having missed the requisite number of mortgage payments. Nevertheless, a number of governmental investigations are still in progress.
The fact is, buyers of bank-owned properties in nearly every jurisdiction are protected from later title attacks by foreclosed homeowners by the bona fide purchaser rule, under which courts would prefer to simply award cash damages to be paid by the culpable bank to a wrongfully foreclosed-on homeowner, rather than reversing the sale or ownership to the new, innocent buyer. Additionally, the title insurers have now changed their tune and restarted issuing insurance policies on bank-owned homes which protect buyers' interests, after working with the banks for them to take responsibility in the event a former homeowner prevails in a wrongful foreclosure suit.
While there are still many intricacies of title to be resolved for foreclosure buyers who purchase homes at trustee sales and auctions, or for cash buyers who often went without title insurance in the past, on the average, Trulia-listed, bank-owned property purchased with an average mortgage and title insurance, the chances a buyer's title will later be successfully challenged by the foreclosed homeowner on the basis of robo-signing? Exceedingly slim.
Myth #3: Buyers should wait for the shadow inventory to be released. Many a buyer, discouraged with the homes they see on the the form in their price range, has decided to sit still and wait for the banks to release for sale what is called their "shadow inventory" - rumored to be anywhere from 4 to nearly 6 million homes that have already been foreclosed, but not listed for sale, or will be foreclosed in the near future. The fact is, to the extent that the banks have acknowledged the existence of a pool of homes they own but are not selling, they have expressed that their reasoning for holding the homes off the market is to avoid flooding the market and driving home values down any further. For that reason, buyers should not expect to see a massive influx of these shadow homes onto the market anytime soon - if ever.
The banks' current modus operandi is that as they sell a home, the replace it with another home in that market - if they sell 50 homes in a town that month, they'll put another 50 on the next. So, don't hold your breath waiting for a fabulous new flood of homes. Instead, set up a Trulia alert to notify you when homes that fit your search criteria come on the market, and be ready to call your agent and go visit any and every one that looks like it might be a good fit.
Myth #4: If you’re looking for a deal, you’re looking for a foreclosure. Despite what they may say, no buyer’s heart's fondest desire is to buy a foreclosure. But almost every buyer dreams of buying a great home - and getting a great deal on it. Many people think that to get a great value on their home on today's market, it means they must buy a foreclosure. As a result, the value and other advantages of buying an individually-owned home on today's market are frequently overlooked. Individual sellers with homes on the market right now are generally quite motivated, and understand that their homes are competing with discounted short sales and foreclosed homes. Many of these sellers are slashing prices in an effort to get them sold - the most recent
Trulia Price Reduction Report revealed that 27 percent of homes on the market across the country have had at least one price reduction. Now that's what I call a sale!
Further, individual owners are often much more negotiable on a wide range of contract terms than a bank which owns a foreclosed home. You can work with non-bank owners on things like repairs, closing dates, choice of escrow provider, closing costs and even included personal property much more flexibly than you can when the bank is on the other side of the bargaining table. On top of that, many individually-owned homes are in pristine, move-in condition; that is much rarer with foreclosures. So, don't underestimate the value of the deal you might be able to get on a non-foreclosed home. Just get clear on what you can afford and look at all the homes that are available in that price range, without discriminating against non-foreclosures.
Myth #5: Having a foreclosure on your credit history means it'll take years and years before you can buy again. One of the most Frequently Asked Questions in the
Trulia Voices Community by homeowners who are facing or have just lost a home through foreclosure is how long it will take before they'll be able to buy again. Until recently, the standard wisdom was that 5 years, minimum, would have to have elapsed between the foreclosure and the new home purchase. Now, though, borrowers can obtain an FHA loan with the low, 3.5 minimum down payment requirement as soon as 3 years following a foreclosure. To do so, though, all your other ducks must be in a row.
Post-foreclosure buyers need a credit score of 620-640 to qualify for an FHA loan; higher for a non-FHA loan - given that the foreclosure itself usually dings anywhere from 100-150 points off the credit score (not necessarily counting a full year or more of pre-foreclosure missed payments), former homeowners who want to buy again need to ensure they have no other late payments or credit dings after they lose thier home. You must have clean credit with no derogatory marks like late credit card payments following the foreclosure, and you may also be required to document 12 to 24 months straight of on-time rent payments after the foreclosure.
Further, the bank may impose a lower debt-to-income ratio on post-foreclosure borrowers than on borrowers who have not had a foreclosure, in an effort to keep your mortgage payments low, keep you from overextending yourself and boost the chances you'll be a successful homeowner over the long-term this time around. The bank will also need to see 2 years of continuous employment history in the same field, and documentation that you meet other loan qualification requirements.
P.S. - You should follow Trulia and Tara on Facebook, too!
Comments
I work as a real estate consultant in RI and can help anyone interested in this segment of the market.
ripropertyvalues.com
Jorge Muralles
jorgemuralles.com
Well done Tara.
Everyone whats a deal but purchasing a residence that is foreclosed or has been approved for a short sale represents a nightmare.
There are many residences that are priced in the same range as the short sales and foreclosures that eliminate a plethora of time and frustration. Instructing your buyers is key. You might also want to tell them that not going through the hassle is worth a little more. Time is money.
Glen Godlonton
http://www.godlonton.com
Very informative. Of course, as its been said, every market is different. I haven;t really thought about it too much, but that certainly applies to the way the banks are approaching the foreclosure situation in different areas. Here, in Wilmington, NC, there are bank owned properties being held off the market. I'm not sure what the exact reason is (whether the bank is trying to avoid flooding the market, or not). I've come accross multiple homes that have already been assigned to real estate companies, and have their contact info on the door, but the agents are not allowing the properties to be shown until they officially hit the market.???
Its also interesting to see the average time it takes for banks to complete the foreclosure process in different states. States have different laws about the procedure, and each case is unique. It may take 12 months for one, and only 6 for another.. but it seems that delaying is largely a strategic way to: minimize risk and costs associated with holding property, and to avoid flooding the market. There are so many factors it can make your head spin. I'd like to think at least a small part of it is a result of the banks trying to work with owners. 26 months in New York...WOW.
Thanks for the good read Tara.
Just last week I spoke with a lady that paid her rent in cash to a landlord that was not a professional management company. No way to verify her rental payments. In fairness this was compounded by the fact that she wanted to buy the home she was renting.
I copied and pasted the information below straight from our underwriting manual, keep in mind this is OUR underwriting guidelines, not FHA. The FHA book sets the minimum standards; every lender may have higher levels and usually do based on how they fund the loan. We fund using our own money and sell the loans to investors later. The layers that are higher than the FHA minimums are required by the investors we sell the loans to.
Scores < 640
Borrowers with scores < 640, regardless of the AUS findings, will not be eligible for financing if they have any of the following characteristics:
Debt To Income at 50% or greater.
Alternative trades will NOT be allowed (must have a minimum of 3 open AND active trade lines with a 12 month history).
Bankruptcy CH 7 & 13 must be 2 years from the discharged date.
Foreclosures must be 3 years from the completion date.
Scores from 620-639 will require an adjustment to price of (.500).
No late payments allowed in the last 12 months.
No collections, except medical, allowed in the last 12 months.
All collections must be paid with the exception of medical, at the underwriter’s discretion.
Documenting rental history - If the borrower is currently renting, the rental history must be verified. Rental references on the credit report are acceptable if a rating is provided. A minimum of 12 months must be verified via cancelled checks and/or bank statements if renting from an individual or VOR if completed by management company.
Written well, short, to the point, Once given the factual consequence of a choice, people are free to make one and move on.
Seems any decision is better than no decision, since indecision is what drives people crazy.
Best, RJ
Lets take the case of B of A who bought out COUNTRYWIDE and ONE WEST BANK who bought INDY MAC. Both banks bought out these two banks at significant discounts. Here's how the deals were structured with the FDIC. The FDIC sold the notes at huge discounts. One of the conditions were that B of A and ONE WEST BANK can foreclose a home on the original note amount and not on the discounted amount which they bought them for. From a numbers stand point, a $400,000 original note from COUNTRYWIDE sold for $280,000 to INDY MAC, a 30% discount. When INDY MAC forecloses on a home, they foreclose on the original note of $400,000 and not $280,000. Now where is the justice here. This is really illegal in my view. Shouldn't the government have made it a requirement for INDY MAC to then restructure these notes at prevailing market rates. They could have but they didn't, which in my view goes to prove that the bail out was a mirage structured to hand our tax money out to the banks.
Now let's look at the players in the game. INDY MACs case Paulson was the key architect of the deal, and guess what? it's the same Paulson who also is part owner of ONE WEST BANK. Now tell me if this is first of all not a ARMS LENGTH transaction, second of all, double dipping, and worse case of all a SCAM!!!!
My question here is where's the homeowners bail out?and wouldn't it been cheaper and easier to restructure these loans at these discounted amounts? Absolutely, and it would not have cost anybody a dime. Unfortunately, the people involved in the deal makings are all connected and it's all about their pockets.
Now lets look at the other bank SCAM which was the cause of this whole real estate debarcle. Collateralized Debts known as CODs, where loans were packaged, securitized and sold to investors as blind pools. The loan packages were primarily OPTION ARMs and ALTA-A loans. There were three layers of risks to these COD investments and as such the same three layers of investors. The banks takes the very top layer with the least risk and the Hedge Funds, Mutual funds, Private Investors, etc, takes the very bottom layer which is the highest risk but the most profitable. Now during the boom times of 2001-early 2005 these were the Wall Street Hot investment commodities, until mid 2005 when the people who started this whole CDO thing realized that it was structured to be doomed and opted out of CDO investmenting. Now the banks started to realized that also but were stuck with the investments, so they began inside selling....yes, amongst themselves and in within the same company most times and made huge profits, and all for their bonuses ..isn't this illegal by the way?.
Then in 2007 it all came crashing down as homeowners started defaulting on their OPTION ARM loans, then in 2008 the ALTA-A loans followed. Now those private CDO investors are going after the banks for selling blind CDO pools as well as security frauds associated with the investment.
Now what comes to light for me here is this, if banks, and I would include the Federal Reserve Banks, purposely promoted these toxic loans primarily with the intent of making huge profits in the CDO investments, then they would have known or anticiapated this disasterous event. If such was the case, then should they not be required by Federal Government requirements, (if any) to remedy what they had caused the consumer. Or are they going to just either turn a blind eye and blame the market, or keep bailing the banks and Wall Street out. If such is to be the case, then I would have to say that "IT'S NOT A CRIME IF YOU ARE A BANK OR WALL STREET" or, most appropriately, " CRIME PAYS WELL IF YOU ARE A BANK OR WALL STREET"
Trulia, I hope you pay her enough!
Thanks Tara, your articles help me become a more educated Realtor, and that helps me in the eyes of clients.
Gary Tippner
http://www.callgarytoday.com
For those buyers who are looking for a great deal and think it is only going to be found in a Forclosure. Let me share this, I work as a REALTOR here in Southern California and have observed and sold many homes ( REO - BANK OWNED / SHORT SALE / STANDARD SALE / PROBATE) and what I can report is that each home or property type needs to be considered on a One on One Basis. These properties all have a value and can all be from Excellent condition to Very Poor condition no matter what type of sale. I have seen great deals on all these types of properties and I have also seen them all overpriced. Be sure you are working with a knowledgeable REALTOR who can guide you and protect you every step of the way.
Most buyers and sellers are wanting the best deal but we all need too understand that every home has a VALUE and that's were your local REALTOR can help you out.
Prudential Realty
JOHN SANTANA
JohnSantana4Homes@Yahoo.com
I've been trying to buy a house for several years, Hmm.. over 8 years, excellent FICO, Pre-approved for much more than what good sense allows me to pay for a roof on my head and my family's head, without extending my means to be vulnerable to normal life mishaps. I wondered how people can get themselves in such a huge dept load and call themselves home owners. Buying a house is part of the American Dream, Proud of ownership. Realtors used this to their extreme benefit to push homes and make commissions, how can we trust them?
Banks now, in my whereabouts, are keeping their disturbed home inventory in purgatory. Some just keep the property with its non-paying (so called) owners for years and offer the over inflated price on a short sale, that is, to try to avoid community penalties for bank owned abandoned properties, and some foreclose and rent out through a real-estate company, some just foreclose and keep away. Banks are doing all they can to trickle their inventory to the market to avoid a sudden drop in property values, perhaps that is to keep current owners in their homes, as they do not want them to think, and some of them do, that they own a property that they are servicing its loan that is more than its current value. And the owners that bought their homes as a retirement asset, or a rental/investment asset. That is all understandable.
I had to sell my house, about 10 years ago, in a hurry, with a loss, cause I knew that I would not be able to afford the mortgage payments when I have to move elsewhere for another job. Other folk kept their properties and had to foreclose or other bad outs. I considered myself lucky to have been able to do that.
Now I see around me properties with over inflated values, The system is using my tax money against me to buy a roof on top of my head. Until I see reasonable value that I would not have to feed my family beans and afford to pay for my car repairs if and when it breaks down to be able to go to work. The Banks and real-estate investors (local and foreign) can keep their properties.
I don't know what market you live in, but here in Chicago the prices/interest are down to the point where you can buy and live for less than you can rent a similar property. It is my belief that simple inflation will push values up along with the fact that you have to live somewhere. Many people are willing to pay a small premium for the right to "own" and have the right to change things in their homes and have the stability of having a fixed mortgage that they can budget for in the future. Many of the housing problems were caused by short-term ARMs which did not provide the stability of a 15 or 30 yr fixed mortgage. It is a very complicated situation, and sometimes you have to cut your losses and move on to the next one. Real estate is still the easiest and most profitable investment you can make that will create a passive income with as little as 5% total investment. The numbers are just too good right now to pass up for investors in my market.
Ron Tossell, Realty ONE Group
rontossell@cox.net
Stephanie Greer, Mainstreet Realtors
http://inlandempire-shortsaleblog.com
http://stopforeclosureinlandempire.info/
CHEERS!
If you would like to work with a Big Island Realtor experienced in this market and be able to preview of homes pending foreclosure prior even being listed on the MLS contact me. Paul Chadband Rs, Livingston Realty,
paulchadband@aol.com
In Las Vegas....
REOs are selling very successfully in Las Vegas with no backlash of new buyer with a compromising title.
REO inventory is at 19% on the MLS....50% are short sales....the rest straight sales.
Any buyer whom makes a purchase in Las Vegas today is surely poised with a fabulous deal....as this fabulous city of Las Vegas aka One of the most exciting cities on this planet is "on sale."!!
At least 50% of the market is "short sales" or pre-foreclosure homes. Most sellers aren't going to take a loss, and aren't in a position to pay the difference in valuation, and the banks aren't budging.
This is the real "shadow inventory" and most of these properties are *really* for sale. It is the bank trying to get more out of the property before legally (or illegally) repossessing it.
It makes sense on the face value to try and short sell, avoiding potential property damage & neglect as well as the stigma. In truth, foreclosure isn't even a real foreclosure, and almost every auction is "bought" by the bank, with minimum bids frequently higher than the value of the note, and almost always above market value -- except where there are insider deals.
I'd estimate that probably 80% of "foreclosures" are yet to come, and are being held in limbo in the short sale market, where repossession can be delayed if an offer is made, but the current owners can still be vacated (as opposed to legally evicted), or at least convinced to do upkeep.
Still, with a 20% inflation built in over the next 9 months via "quantitative easing", and negative real interest (for banks), and no other reliable source of long term investment, a house that is still overpriced now might be the best way to hedge your investment. Taking a 20-30% loss on an overpriced, stagnant property over who knows how much otherwise could still be a sound investment. And who knows how long the lending markets (though relatively tight now) will stay open. You could be looking at minimum 20% down at 10%+ APR on a still stagnant market 2 years from now.
Putting money in the bank until the economy get's better is as much a suckers game as making regular contributions to your 401k.
I have chosen to specialize in short sales for many reasons, not the least of which is that I can offer the prospective buyer a real title insurance policy and often negotiate a price that is well below comparable values.
Also, the prospective buyers get the assurance that every offer will be presented to the seller so the process is not so much like an auction and in my opinion the short sale process these days does not take that much longer to close (30 to 60 days in most cases) and offers much more flaxibility and less time pressure on the buyer to perform inspections, get funding, etc.
Basically, other than for the extremely savvy buyer with substantial experience and resources to abosrb a bad buy with lots of surprises, I think the short sale market is a much safer bet.
Joe Robaina, Realtor, TRC
Realty World International Gateway, Inc.
1(800)792-3042
My husband and I live in New Jersey. We are simple people. We pay rent, lease our car and have a credit score averaging 695. This economy flipped us upside down like everyone else in 2008, but we have managed to start a business, in the worst time possible, and NEVER miss the rent payment. Never. The only mortgage I am offered is a 'non-verification' loan requiring 30% down. OK, we can put down 30% on a 200,000 mortgage and we have the closing fees. AND now, the banks want 'reserve'. SO, I will continue to pay someone else's mortgage and NOT buy my own place which is MORE than what my own mortgage would be. Something is wrong with this, but like all big business, there isn't anyone to talk reason. It's all numbers on a grid. Does anyone have some advise on this?!
Just saw a property which I know about--------the property was auctioned in late October-----a Realtor now has it listed in November and being advertised as fully refurbished. Fact, the home was not refurbished in two weeks by the new purchaser, known as an investor at auction. The home was refurbished by the owner.
Is this house being flipped? If so, this isn't free enterprize-------------this is pure greed.
Perhaps the writer would address the subject of 'flipping'---------is it illegal, is it legal?
"Buyers who are looking for short sales or foreclosures are short sighted.
Everyone whats a deal but purchasing a residence that is foreclosed or has been approved for a short sale represents a nightmare.
There are many residences that are priced in the same range as the short sales and foreclosures that eliminate a plethora of time and frustration. Instructing your buyers is key. You might also want to tell them that not going through the hassle is worth a little more. Time is money. .."
The real estate market is similar to the current weather conditions. Meaning it changes from day to day, and may hold steady for a few days.
But in my opinion the housing market is due for a tremendous blow "beneath the belt" so to speak. Washington DC Inc. is planning to eliminate mortgage interest payments from annual tax deductions. If you havent read it, then you been avoiding it. Its real bad news for generations to come who will have to pay off our trillions of dollars in budgets and budget deficits.
Agree this economic collapse is not finished..
Rather than the banks working with people as human beings they look at the homeowners and investors as ciphers to either be subtracted from the bank's balance sheet or added to their balance sheet.
The days of the friendly banker who knew the families who came to their banks are gone-------no longer are loans tailored to suit the individual or individual family. A lot of people got sucked in, scammed pehaps a better word, by the slick presentations-------------now those slick presenters are no where to be found.
With the precarious economy, each time that a short sale or foreclosure is done as one writer wrote today, another family is made homeless-----destabilizing the economy further------destablizing that particular family taking away their capacity to fucntion. to have an abode from which to participate in he economy.
Norma Laine
RE/MAX Metro
http://www.OCDistressedPropertyDeals.info
It's a mess and I select those type of clients very carefully!!!
Myth 1 – the timeframe to go from being served notice to actual foreclosure varies wildly by state, so any blanket statement about the national trend doesn’t mean anything. And by looking at averages, you wipe out the extremes. It is entirely possible for one homeowner to be foreclosed on in 6 months and have the state average be 14 months; you just need another homeowner for whom the foreclosure took 22 months. Looking at the mean time would be more statistically significant.
Myth 2 – Why should we believe the banks have cleared up their mess when they’re the ones (with the collusion of Wall Street bond traders) who created the mess in the first place, by loaning so much money to people who didn’t meet their minimum lending standards? I’ve read of lenders selling bundles of subprime loans to bond traders where 40% of the loans didn’t meet their minimum standards to get a subprime loan. And somehow these loans were bundled into double and triple-A rated bonds. This behavior is the most perfect example I can think of for diligent government regulation of financial markets, and not the fig leaf of regulation that they currently operate under now. It has always been the case that occasionally people who couldn’t afford a home were somehow able to get a loan; our housing crisis and associated economic crisis was precipitated when the banks and Wall Street specifically made their business model the creation exotic loan packages and ignoring common sense lending standards, with the intent of lending to the poorest and least credit worthy people in our country, while never considering what would happened when the teaser interest rate when up by 33% and home prices stopped increasing. (To clarify – if your teaser rate was 6% and it goes up by 2% at the end of two years, that is a 33% increase in your interest rate.) Also, your answer that buyers would be protected by the “bona fide purchasers rule” sounds to me like there is still a good chance you could end up in court, which wouldn’t be without cost, even if the buyer successfully defended their purchase. Additionally, this wouldn’t be assured, because each judge can decide a case based on their perception of the specific merits of the case. Furthermore, even if the past record indicates that the buyer and not the wrongly foreclosed homeowner would win, there haven’t been any test cases related to this specific fraudulent behavior of the banks.
Myth 3 – While you may be right that the banks “MAY” be smart enough (in spite of recent evidence that they are not at all smart) to not release a flood of foreclosed homes onto the market, the effect of releasing a trickle of foreclosures every single month will continue to exert downward pressure on prices. While home buyers may not want to wait for a flood that won’t happen, if they want to wait for prices to hit bottom, waiting until this shadow inventory is near to hitting rock bottom is a sound strategy.
Myth 4 – This is the only one I agree with, over all, although being able to negotiate terms isn’t the same as getting a lower price. You didn’t answer the actual strategy I have to respond to when working with a buyer looking at a foreclosure. There is a perception that banks will consider offers of 50% (or more) off of the asking price, and while this is occasionally the case, it is more common for a foreclosure to sell above the asking price because the aggressive pricing strategy of the bank to sell the home already reflects a significant discount from the competitive, non-foreclosure , market price.
Myth 5 – Your answer confounds logic. You start with the “myth” that it would take years for someone with a foreclosure to be able to buy a home again and your answer is no, it’ll take 3-5 years. Is three to five years not years?
As for the terrible investors, of which I am one, we are buying properties and fixing them up so that the people who can no longer afford to live in the homes they bought have somewhere decent and affordable to rent. Has it not occurred to anyone that since they can't buy, they MUST rent, and if no one buys the foreclosed and short-sale properties, the prices on existing rental inventory will go through the roof?
I have a friend who will tell you that the best thing that happened to his family was foreclosure. They struggled for years to pay an ever-expanding mortgage, trying to provide for their kids, keeping two decrepit vehicles running because they could not afford a car loan. When they lost the home, they were devestated. But now, just four months later, in a rental that they can afford, in a nice area close the kid's schools, and with a little spare cash in their pockets, they wish they had let the darn thing go long ago.
PS I am short-selling a home I had intended to live in a long time until I got laid off. I down-sized and moved on, and am now helping my clients to do the same.
The big news in my opinion is with Fannie Mae - not FHA. Currently Fannie Mae is changing their timeframes post foreclosure from 5 to 7 years. Seven years is a long time and we are going to be impacted by this crisis for a long time.
I'd also like to point out that to us lenders a modification, short sale, deed in lieu and foreclosure are all treated like a foreclosure from the standpoint of eligibility for loans etc. A lot of sellers are going to be surprised when they realize that with a short sale they are going to be non-financeable for a number of years. (FHA does have some exceptions depending on the status of the loan at the time of the short sale but I don't see this being something very many lenders will offer). So be careful with the advice you give to sellers - in a lot of cases they would be much better off going through foreclosure. One comment to your article was that sellers have to worry about deficiency judgments with a foreclosure - it's short sales that bring the potential of deficiency judgments. Deficiency judgments have the potential of hanging over a consumer for 26 years - 6 years initially on a credit report with the creditor having the option of renewing the judgment 2 times at 10 years a pop. 3 years or 7 years is going to seem pretty short when compared to how long a deficiency judgment can linger. Again, we need to be really careful with the advice we are giving sellers.
Interesting times to say the least.
National Loan Council
GOV;T PROGRAMS AVAILABLE FOR:
Loan Modifications, Short Sale Approval and REO Properties Available!
http://www.nationalloancouncil.us
We have another wave of homes coming over the hill; Mansions owned by professionals like Doctors, Attorneys etc. These million dollar homes are both primary and investment properties that were once affordable. It is not to say that these professionals are not making great income but the IRS has become their "Piper" as these folks were accustomed to refinance and pay the bill in the past. But, now things are different, the well is dry.
CPA's are having a field day as they restructure and recalibrate the financial screws for these once high-net worth individuals. As a matter of fact CPA's are great team players and can help realtors obtain listings of homes for short sales.
We have syncicated a group of professionals and we are never idle. Things are good.
Maurice Stewart (561) 202-7939
5 paragraphs = not busy agent.
Great article!
If you do nothing, the foreclosure process will end quickly. But if you do something and try to fight it, it can take two years or longer in some cases. It varies.
There's a lot of truth about the fact that foreclosed properties are less well maintained by the owners. So be prepared to spend some money to fix up the place. Since you won't have the opportunity to look at the inside, you won't know what the actual conditions are to estimate the cost of repairs.
Getting title insurance is usually not difficult on a short sale. On a trustee's sale, it's a different story. I've had clients who bought properties at the trustee's sales only to receive notices of rescission from the trustees who said that they'd made a mistake.
Taking over a property with no warranty, no guarantee or no professional inspection is like handing over your money to the next Bernie Madoff. You know deep in your heart it just doesn't make sense, but you do it anyway. Most foreclosure buyers tell you what a great deal they got at the piurchase price, but then start muttering when you asked how much did it cost to get the ready to live in, and how long did it take.
David Cooper 702-488-7037
http://www.lsvegaswinner.org
==============================
First Time Buyer Mortgages
With numbers like those, there are bound to be plenty of myths floating around. Great post to help combat some of the bad news out there. Kudos.
I am a short sale specialist who has closed her 18 short sale file last month. Tough market but when you know the game it really help the consumer.