Bank of America Corp. said it would offer more borrowers reductions in their mortgage-loan balances in the latest twist on efforts to avert foreclosures.
The plan is the mortgage industry's boldest move yet to address the plight of the millions of U.S. homeowners who are "underwater," owing more than the current values of their homes. It enhances an agreement Bank of America reached 18 months ago with state attorneys general to settle claims they made over certain high-risk loans made by Countrywide Financial before Bank of America acquired that lender in mid-2008.
Reductions of as much as 30% in loan principal will be offered to struggling borrowers who have subprime or so-called option adjustable-rate mortgages, known as option ARMs. (Option ARMs, no longer available, allow borrowers to start with minimal monthly payments and face steep increases later.) Also included will be certain loans that have a fixed interest rate for the first two years before starting to adjust annually.
Amid the worst wave of foreclosures since the 1930s, banks generally have been reluctant to reduce principal. Instead, most loan modifications—including those under the government-subsidized Home Affordable Modification Program—involve reducing interest rates to as low as 2%. Some also extend loan terms to 40 years to shrink monthly payments.
But banks are finding that many deeply underwater borrowers aren't willing to keep making even reduced payments because they believe they have little hope of ever having equity in their homes and would be better off renting and perhaps buying a cheaper home later. The Bank of America program is aimed to give such borrowers more hope by reducing their loan balances to current estimated home values. 
Bank of America said the program might eventually be extended to other types of loans. The U.S. Treasury, which runs the HAMP loan-modification program, also has been considering ways to encourage more principal reduction but has indicated that any such steps were likely to be modest.
Under the Bank of America plan, the maximum decrease in principal will be 30%, and borrowers will have to "earn" the lower balances in stages over five years by keeping up on their new, lowered payments.
By cutting principal, Bank of America said, it will reduce the risk that these borrowers will default again later. "We believe this could become an industry model for principal forgiveness," the bank said.
The program also addresses the woes of option ARM borrowers whose loan balances have increased over the years because they made minimal payments that deferred part of their interest due. Some of these borrowers will qualify for a reduction in their principal to as low as 95% of the home value.
To determine the market value of a home under the program, Bank of America plans to use computer models that estimate those values or, in some cases, opinions from real-estate brokers. Those estimated values will then be adjusted annually using metropolitan-area price indexes, Bank of America officials said.
First American CoreLogic, a real-estate data provider, has estimated that 11.3 million U.S. households, or 24% of those with mortgages, were underwater at the end of 2009. 
$8,000 is a powerful incentive for home buyers who are buying their first home, especially when half of the homes in the country are trading at below $172,000. Visit www.TheLaJollaLife.com
However, we are also a nation of procrastinators, so the tax credit is really only effective as it nears expiration. We saw this with the new home tax credit in California last Spring and we saw it with the national tax credit last Fall. Note the spike in existing home sales in October and November in the chart below. The existing home data is actually closing data, so most of these contracts were entered into in August September. Call Justin Brennan for all your real estate needs. 619-823-2120
|
|
I see a large "W" shaped sales volume curve forming, with a huge decline when the December and January data is released, and a potentially even larger spike in May and June, with the new tax credit available to all buyers instead of just entry-level buyers.
Visit Justin's Youtube channel. http://www.youtube.com/user/jbrennan20
Source _ John Burns Real Estate Consulting.
Timing
The waiver is effective beginning on February 1st for one year. The waiver also includes the language “with regard to subsequent sales by purchasers”. While it appears this waiver applies to new sales, we will check w/ FHA to see if it can be applied to sales that have already occurred and did not meet previous exemptions.
CONDITONS
In the waiver, FHA said it was taking this action to address the foreclosure crisis.
The waiver is limited to sales meeting the following conditions:
o Ways to ensure no unacceptable arrangements include:
Waiver provides what the inspection must review and other requirements
Hello San Diego and La Jolla, CA. Justin Brennan chiming in again for all my clients and potential home owners in 2010. I converse with many of my lending partners to get my clients the best mortgage info updated weekly. So.... Jan 14th 2010 here is where we are at. For more info please visit my website www.TheLaJollaLife.com.
Mortgage rates halted their four-week upward climb last week as the New Year began. The jobs lost number last week did disappoint some, with 85,000 jobs lost. However, November’s numbers were revised to show a net gain of 4,000 jobs. This is the first month of job growth in two years. Other economic indicators also pointed to an economy that is beginning to gain some footing.
Both ISM surveys showed greater that expected growth.This week contains plenty of data that could push rates either way. However, given recent news, it is very unlikely that rates will fall back much. The government’s current program of buying mortgagebacked securities is set to expire in March. There is a growing call for the program to be scaled back or even terminated. With private markets still on shaky ground, this could mean rates would need to increase to find investors for mortgage-backed products. Other news, such as Industrial Production data and the Consumer Price Index, could push rates either way this week too. www.TheLaJollaLife.com
My guess is that the typical American puts more thought into the search for a flat-screen TV than into the choice of a mortgage lender. www.TheLaJollaLife.com

Shopping for a TV is fairly straightforward. You read reviews online or in Consumer Reports; you eyeball a few models in the store to see if the image looks sharp; then you buy from whichever merchant has the lowest price. If the TV doesn’t work, the merchant gives you a new one.
Shopping for a mortgage is more complicated, less fun and infinitely more dangerous to your long-term financial interests. At the end of the process, you probably have no idea of whether you got the best deal available. Was the upgrade on those cherry kitchen cabinets really worth the high rate and fees you paid to the lender affiliated with your friendly home builder? Probably not, but that salesman sure was persuasive, and you were glad to be relieved of spending the next three days shopping for mortgages.
Now help is on the way from a most unlikely source: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD.
Federal rules that take effect Friday mandate a standard, three-page Good Faith Estimate that urges consumers to shop around for the best loan and helps them compare lenders’ offerings. The rules, announced by HUD in November 2008 but just taking effect this week, are an update of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, a 1974 law known as Respa. (See WSJ story.)
One difficulty of shopping for mortgages is that the lender with the lowest rates often isn’t offering the best deal. High fees can wipe out the benefits of low rates, and little-noticed features such as prepayment penalties might blow up on you later on. Even for members of Mensa, it’s hard to compare different combinations or rates, “points” (paid in exchange for a lower rate), fees and other terms. Lenders often sprinkled in lots of confusing charges, such as processing and messenger fees, to pad their margins. Dickering over theses “junk” fees distracted borrowers from the bigger picture of total costs.
All of these complexities favor lenders, of course. The more confused you get, the less likely you are to realize you just got fleeced.
To address those problems, the new estimate form requires lenders to wrap all the fees they control into one “origination charge.” That lets you compare one lender’s fees with another’s.Jack Guttentag, a finance professor emeritus at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, recommends that borrowers focus on two items as they shop: the interest rate and the “adjusted origination charge,” which includes any points paid to lower the rate.
Good Faith Estimates have been around for decades, but there was no standard format. Under the new rules, lenders and mortgage brokers are required to give consumers the standard estimate forms within three days of receiving a loan application.
Lenders aren’t allowed to increase the origination fee from the estimate. Some additional charges, including title services and recording charges, can increase by as much as a combined 10%. Estimates for other charges, such as homeowner’s insurance and other services provided by third parties selected by the borrower, aren’t subject to such limits.
Title insurance typically is the largest fee, and the new forms let consumers know they don’t have to accept the insurer suggested by the lender. Mr. Guttentag says title insurance can be “vastly overpriced” and consumers should take the time to shop for it.
Settlement firms, which organize the closings of home sales, will be required to issue a new version of the HUD-1 form used in closings. This new HUD-1 includes a comparison of the estimated and final costs, as well as a summary of the loan terms.
Will all this make a big difference? Mr. Guttentag, who has been exposing the tricks of lenders and brokers for decades, thinks the new rules will help, though they aren’t a cure-all.
Much depends on whether Americans want to put in a bit of effort rather than simply accept the often biased mortgage advice of a real estate agent, home builder, broker or banker. The real estate agent may urge you to use an affiliate of his firm, or recommend the lender most likely to grant a loan quickly rather than the one with the best terms. The builder wants you to use his in-house lender. The brokers and loan officers are working for themselves, not for you.
When you’re trying to pick a new TV, you don’t rely on a TV manufacturer to give you an impartial review of the alternatives. www.TheLaJollaLife.com