Home > Blogs > Feldman Law Center's Blog
5,928 views

Feldman Law Center's Blog

Feldman Law Center - Mortgage News by Feldman Law Center

By Feldman Law Center | Other/Just Looking in Mission Viejo, CA
  • Effective Loan Modification Knowledge - Loan Modification News

    Posted Under: Foreclosure in Mission Viejo  |  December 15, 2009 11:28 AM  |  1,037 views  |  1 comment
    Many people facing foreclosure and in dire financial circumstances have in-depth questions regarding loan modifications.  At the Feldman Law Center, our skilled loan modification attorney team works hard to provide the best possible information to borrowers and others who are interested.  Here are some answers to some of those questions.

    Q: What makes a loan modification proposal acceptable to lenders?

    A: Creditors and lenders are usually looking for certain criteria when considering loan modifications, and the property owner usually needs to show two main facts:  an evident hardship and inability to keep making mortgage payments at the current rate; and a clearly demonstrated ability to continue paying the monthly mortgage payments at a new, reduced rate.  A California loan modification attorney can be a great asset in compiling the necessary information for this process, because a skilled California loan modification attorney will have years of experience in compiling such information.  You need to compile your last two years’ financial information which includes pay stubs, tax returns, bills, loan information and more. You also need to write a hardship letter detailing your current financial situation and how a loan modification would improve your chances of staying in your home.

    Q: Which is better, a refinancing or a loan modification?

    A: To be honest, a loan modification and refinancing are two completely different things, and really there isn’t a better option between these two.  It’s sort of like comparing apples and oranges.

    If you refinance your mortgage, a completely new mortgage is created and the existing mortgage is paid off.  With a loan modification, your existing home loan mortgage is restructured so that the monthly payments are more affordable.  A California loan modification attorney can sit down with you, assess your situation and let you know if a loan modification is the right answer your current situation.

    Q: How much does it cost to modify a loan?


    A: The answer to this question will change from person to person and from situation to situation.  The best way to get a definitive answer is to sit down for an initial consultation with a qualified, successful loan modification attorney and ask him or her exactly how much their services will cost and what the fees will be.  The initial consultation will most likely be free and you may be able to make a payment schedule for other fees.

    In the end, you should really be asking yourself how much it would cost you if you just allowed your home to go into foreclosure.  Think about losing your home and the serious investment you’ve put into it.  You not only lose the thousands of dollars a month it costs to pay your mortgage, but you also lose your place to live. 

    At the Feldman Law Center, our highly skilled California home loan modification attorneys will work hard to provide you with the best loan modification information and skilled team of professionals.  We work hard to keep Californians in their homes by aggressively negotiating with lenders and banks.  While other loan modification companies can’t provide you a skilled loan modification attorney, our loan modification law firm will provide top notch representation.  Your well being will be our number one priority.

    Visit us at http://www.feldmanlawcenter.com or call 800-588-0425. Foreclosure Help
  • Banks are Feeling the Hurt - Loan Modification News and Advice

    Posted Under: Foreclosure  |  October 12, 2009 9:39 AM  |  1,001 views  |  No comments
    The Feldman Law Center works with borrowers everyday who have difficult financial problems based in part on their strenuous mortgage loans.  Trying to find relief from banks is a major challenge, in part from because of the problems banks are having.  Banks are frustrated by their mounting losses due to their own poor financial planning, and people are hurting as a result.

    Case in point, on September 25, 2009 the Wall Street Journal had the following stories on the front page of their Money & Investing section:  “Home sales Sap the Dow, Down 41.11”; “Losses on Banks’ Big Loans: $53 Billion”; and, “Raters Race Fresh Push in House Over Claims.”  The major global banks, and some of the more regional ones, are hurting so bad from the housing crisis that they are grasping at straws wherever they can.  Sales of new and used homes are down, banks are losing money on large loans (those starting at $20 million), and credit raters are being hammered by politicians and the general public.

    If you are facing a foreclosure on your home, this should alarm you for a few different reasons.  For starters, if you are a homeowner who needs a loan modification, you are going to have to convince the bank that you are able to continue to make payments and that it’s better to give you a loan modification than to foreclose on your home.  However, banks are almost in a “slash and burn” mentality, where they are simply looking for the easiest way out of their jam.  Rather than look at long term gains, banks such as Fifth Third Bancorp are looking for quick ways to remedy their multi-million dollar financial losses.

    Another reason for concern is the high turnover rate of bank executives and bank policy.  Banks are trading executives like they’re baseball cards, making their financial policies an ever-changing landscape.  For homeowners, this could be good or bad.  It could be good, because with the right California loan modification attorney, it might be the right time to take advantage of the situation and get the best deal possible.  However, it could be bad, because a deal that exists today might not exist tomorrow.  If a homeowner tries to contact a bank executive they were dealing with a month ago, that person might no longer work at that bank.

    Lastly, with the credit ratings in flux, it means that the way banks determine credit rates will continue to change.  Again, this could go either way for homeowners, because banks are on totally new ground.  One of the biggest ways that homeowners get loan modifications is by getting a change in their interest rate.  Banks determine interest rates by taking a number of factors into consideration.  As these factors begin to change, having a qualified California home loan modification attorney working with you to take advantage of possible changes in your favor is important.

    Being able to stay on top of the news coming out of the banking industry is near impossible for any California homeowner, and having a qualified California loan modification attorney working on your behalf is incredibly valuable.

    About Us
    The Feldman Law Center was founded for the purpose of negotiating loan modifications on behalf of their clients. These negotiations have two major goals; to reduce mortgage payments to a level of affordability for the homeowner and to either stop or avoid foreclosure proceedings. Visit us at http://www.feldmanlawcenter.com or call 800-588-0425 for more information about home loan modification.
  • http://www.blogcatalog.com/directory/loans

    Posted Under: Foreclosure  |  September 28, 2009 11:04 AM  |  991 views  |  No comments
    http://www.blogcatalog.com/directory/loans
  • “We do not Hold Foreclosed Properties off the Market” – Loan Modification News and Advice

    Posted Under: Foreclosure  |  September 25, 2009 7:03 AM  |  993 views  |  No comments

    Loan Modification News: As defaults in California rose during the second quarter, foreclosures dropped by 28% when compared to the year earlier quarter, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick. Industry analysts consider growing defaults as a leading indicator for future foreclosures and were quick to label the quarter as the eye of the foreclosure storm. Part of the drop in foreclosures was attributed to foreclosure moratoriums which were either mandated by the state or voluntarily self imposed by private lenders. Many of the self imposed moratoriums were put in while lenders and servicers waited for the details of the Obama Administration’s Home Affordability and Stability Plan (HASP). The moratoriums were pulled once the guidelines were published in early March. Another aspect of the decline in foreclosures is that lenders currently have no sense of urgency toward repossessing homes and have been lengthening the time they allow before taking action. The slow movement on foreclosure filings is probably due to a steep supply of already foreclosed homes versus the very limited level of demand.

    The decline in foreclosures is building a backlog that will need to be dealt with at some point. Banks “need to get serious about processing the backlog of delinquencies, either with workouts or foreclosure,” DataQuick President John Walsh said. “We’re hearing that some lenders and servicers are doing just that, hiring more people to do the necessary paperwork. That means the foreclosure numbers will probably shoot back up during the third quarter.”

    A worsening employment picture is also expected to drive foreclosures at a pace much faster than seen during the first half of the year. On a national level, there were 1.5 million foreclosure filings during the first six months of 2009. Estimates are for another 2 million foreclosures during the second half. Bank of America, the largest servicer of mortgages in the country, is estimating that its foreclosure sales could rise as much as 30%, but that number could dependent on a big jump in demand for foreclosed homes.

    While unemployment is currently the biggest driver for foreclosures, another issue is causing increased concerns among industry watchers; the consistent deterioration of housing prices is increasing the amount of homes that are under water on a monthly basis. Zillow.com, a real estate pricing and information site has estimates that put 57% of Los Angeles County homes purchased since 2004 under water. First American CoreLogic estimates nearly one in ten of Los Angeles County homeowners were in default as of May. When negative equity is combined with monthly struggles to make the mortgage the chances of default are much higher. In fact, homeowners are now walking away from homes even when the payments are affordable because they realize they may never get back to the price at which they bought the house. The more the home goes under water the more it becomes a burden in the owner’s mind. “The negative equity makes the homeowner vulnerable. The second trigger is some kind of household balance sheet problem, like a job loss or large medical expense,” said Sam Khater, senior economist for First American CoreLogic.

    As to whether the rate of foreclosures is being held back by lenders, there appears to be two lines of thought; the official and the unofficial. The official line from banking officials was recently given by Bank of America’s Jumana Bauwens who said, “We do not hold foreclosed properties off the market.” Unofficial statements tend to lean more toward pacing sales rather than flooding the market with homes when there is slack demand. It could be that both are telling the truth. Technically, if Bank of America can’t process the flood of foreclosures on the books due to lack manpower, they can’t foreclose on the properties. That would synchronize with the opinion of USC economist Richard Green, who heads the university’s Lusk Center for Real Estate, who expressed skepticism that banks would have the wherewithal to control the pace of foreclosure saying, “That would require a cleverness among lenders we’re not seeing in any other dimension. If they could coordinate on that they could coordinate better on loan modifications.”

    Regardless of what is being said about how and when the pace of foreclosures will increase, homeowners should not get complacent about their struggles with their payments. Being proactive in seeking help to modify the terms on a mortgage is the best way to stay ahead of a possible foreclosure filing. If you are struggling with your mortgage payment, call the Feldman Law Center today at (800) 527 8497 or visit www.feldmanlawcenter.com – Loan Modification Company

  • The Key to Successful Loan Modifications – Loan Modification Advice

    Posted Under: Financing in Mission Viejo  |  September 23, 2009 7:00 AM  |  1,038 views  |  No comments

    As the Obama Administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) approaches its sixth month, the challenges facing the plan are becoming more clearly defined while solutions to those challenges remain a work in progress. Admittedly off to a slow start, the program has about 200,000 loan modifications in its trial phase, according to Treasury officials. The trial phase of a loan modification is three month period where homeowners are granted lower payments while terms on the existing mortgage are modified. With 1.5 million foreclosure filings in the first half of the year alone the program needs to be ramped up significantly before it can make a material difference in the foreclosure crisis.

    At hearings held last week in Washington D.C. last week, the tone was that of frustration and confusion as to why there aren’t more modification getting done. Bred by that frustration, new plans were proposed and the rationale behind the foot dragging by lenders and servicers was hypothesized by industry insiders and analysts. Plans to turn foreclosed homeowners into renters and allowing for homeowners to put their homes back to lenders and demand reductions on their mortgage balances were a couple of ideas advanced by those convinced that the home loan modification plan that HAMP is based on has failed. Both plans still needed work to fill the gaping holes in logic behind them, as admitted by the designers of those plans.

    Others, including economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, postulated theories on why banks are not embracing loan modifications whole heartedly. The Boston Fed’s new research suggests that the loan-modification effort may also be based on faulty economic assumptions. Their study basically refutes the idea of “everybody wins” loan modifications, based on the opinion that the process underestimates two of lenders’ strongest incentives to decide against modification. The first incentive is that, according to statistics, about a third of struggling homeowners “self heal” by finding new employment or by making other financial adjustments like selling other assets. Since lenders have no idea which third of their portfolio is going to self heal they are willing to sit back and let situations play out instead of modifying the loan. The second disincentive is the high re-default rate on loan modifications. Again, according to the Boston Fed, banks are now looking at the historically high failure rates on modifications and deciding that they’re not worth the trouble. The summary of the Boston Fed economists is that, “the number of ‘preventable foreclosures’ may be far fewer than many believe.”

    The problem with the theories proposed by the Boston Fed is that each disincentive carries a critical flaw; in the case of self healing homeowners, the flaw is that they’re using historical statistics that are based on a relatively healthy economy. Under normal circumstances, a homeowner may lose employment for a few months, fall behind on the mortgage, get re-hired, and then catch up on the missed payments. The odds for that kind of situation playing out in today’s economy are much lower with the national unemployment rate approaching 10% and certain states, like California, seeing jobless rates at 12%. Decreases in the average hourly work week are making it tougher on those that are employed as well. Executing loan modifications which lower payments in these situations still makes sense for the lender, especially if the modification is tailored to the needs of the homeowner.

    The second flawed piece of their theory is based on high default rates on modifications executed in 2008. As a relatively new practice at that time, a high percentage of modifications didn’t lower payments at all and, in the case of negative amortization loans, actually raised them. Without payment reductions, it’s not a surprise at all that homeowners fell behind again after getting modifications that didn’t address the cause of the problem; mortgage payments that were too high relative to the homeowners’ income.

    Contrary to the opinion of the Boston Fed and those looking for alternatives to loan modifications, there are loan modifications that are working and that can provide an “everyone wins” outcome, or at an least an outcome that inflicts the least amount of damage possible to all parties involved. The mortgage loan modifications which are working involve two changes; the first is a mortgage payment lowered by at least twenty percent. The second is a principle reduction on the mortgage balance, a relatively rare occurrence so far but one that is gradually proving out, especially when compared to foreclosure on the property. While lowering the interest rates is now considered a “given” for a successful modification, principle reductions are now been seen as the key to successful modifications. With foreclosure sales bogged down with both over supply and limited demand, bids at auction are now coming in between 30 and 60% of the mortgage balances for the small percentage of homes that actually attract buyers. Weighed against a 40 to 70% haircut and a one in fifty chance that the home will sell, cutting a principle balance by 20 to 30% looks like a big win. The servicer continues to charges fees off (smaller) payment collections and the homeowner has a home that is once again affordable. With an economy that is redefining what a win looks like, making or losing less money might just feel like a big victory when compared to the alternatives.

    According to Steve Feldman, Senior Partner and loan modification attorney at The Feldman Law Center, “We are beginning to see a more receptive environment for principle reductions as lenders see statistics showing the success of loan modifications that include them.” He added, “The loan modifications for our homeowners that reduce principle balances give them a lot of confidence about staying in their homes, regardless of the current hardship they might be facing.”
    There are some big issues that must be overcome so that loan modifications can play the role that the administration intends for them. Some are directly related to the process of getting a loan modification through the approval process such as hiring and training of staff and building the infrastructure to process reams of paperwork. The biggest obstacle at the moment, however, is an economy in recession which will trump even the noblest efforts in loan modifications by continuing to subtract jobs from the economy. A new focus on jump starting the economy with wide spread use of a proven mortgage loan modification formula could be exactly what everyone is looking for; a solution to the foreclosure crisis.

    Feldman Law Center – Loan Modification Company – Visit www.feldmanlawcenter.com for more information.

  • Feldman Law Center – Saxon Mortgage Services in the Crosshairs

    Posted Under: Foreclosure in Mission Viejo  |  August 17, 2009 11:00 AM  |  1,126 views  |  No comments

    Feldman Law Center: According to an April Credit Suisse Group analysis of the home loan modification performance by mortgage servicers, the winner is Litton Loan Servicing, a Goldman Sachs Group Inc. unit, while the worst of the group was Saxon Mortgage Services, a division of Morgan Stanley. According to the study, Litton modified 28% of the mortgages it oversees that originated between 2005 and 2007. Saxon modified less than a quarter of Litton’s number at 6%.
    These loan servicers are the focus of the Obama Administration’s frustration due to the slow rollout of the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) since its initiation in March. Adding to that frustration is that the slow rollout of loan modifications under HAMP guidelines has occurred while foreclosures continue to increase at a record breaking pace. Estimated to hit 2.4 million by yearend just two months ago, foreclosure estimates for the year are now being raised to 3.5 million due to increased activity in the second quarter. Foreclosures exceeded 300,000 for each month of the quarter.  The second quarter statistics have spurred administration officials to summon high ranking representatives from the servicers to Washington D.C. for a meeting with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Shaun Donovan, Secretary of HUD, in late July to see what can be done to ramp up the pace of loan modifications across the country.


    When the Center for Responsible Lending, a financial-services research and policy firm, was estimating 2.4 million foreclosures for the year, their estimate on the number of surrounding homes which would be affected by foreclosures and resulting price decreases stood at 69.5 million. Their very conservative estimate put the loss per home at $7,200 which would translate to a drop of over half a trillion dollars in property values across the country. With new estimates of 3.5 million foreclosures for the year and the likelihood that foreclosures will be increasing for higher end properties, the numbers from the Center for Responsible Lending look wildly optimistic.
    The government effort to stem this rising tide of foreclosures rests squarely on shoulders of the mortgage servicers but one look at Saxon’s operations confirms that they have a long way to go before they can start processing the influx of applications with anything approaching efficiency. Saxon’s problems started immediately after HAMP was announced as they were flooded with phone calls, requests for information, and paperwork. So much paperwork, in fact, that an internal audit in May determined that their scanning equipment was overloaded with documents sent in by homeowners seeking home loan modifications. The overload resulted in delays, lost documents, and applications.
    One of Saxon’s biggest issues is that when it was purchased by Morgan Stanley in 2006, it was servicing approximately 165,000 loans. Instead of hunkering down with a portfolio that was beginning to fall apart, the company had more than doubled the number of loans it serviced by the end of June 2008. Most of the new loans were subprimes from other servicers that were either failing or leaving the business.
    Saxon was also caught flat-footed on staffing up for the coming rush of loan modifications. Like other mortgage servicers, the company performed a relatively straightforward set of functions, acting as the direct interface with borrowers on behalf of the insurance companies, pension funds, and Wall Street institutions that owned the mortgages. Those functions included processing payments, maintaining impound accounts, and collecting delinquent payments.

    While other companies began gearing toward loan modifications much earlier, Saxon’s energies were being spent on servicing their growing portfolio. Their growing subprime mortgage portfolio was already blowing up in the first half of 2007 when they finally started contemplating loan modifications. It would take another 18 months before the company started adding capacity for mortgage loan modifications. Saxon, late to the game and scrambling to catch up, was immediately buried in applications after the announcement of HAMP by the Treasury and the Administration.


    It would take another ten weeks for their internal audit to reveal what everyone already knew; that the company was drowning with inadequate infrastructure and a staff that was untrained, inexperienced, and too small. Since that May audit the company has brought in four outside companies help handle the thousands of calls that pour in daily.
    At present, and while still servicing loans that are performing, Saxon and the other servicers are under intense pressure to train a legion of employees in the art of negotiating and executing loan modifications. The problem with the training aspect, as faced by all servicers is that each loan has its own set of circumstances with mortgages owned by different investors with different parameters for judging the merits of each modification. Without an instructional template available, trainees are basically being taught on the fly with a new lesson waiting with each new loan modification that lands in their inbox.


    Next up for Saxon is the sure to be unpleasant July 28th meeting with Treasury and HUD officials Washington D.C. One of the issues to be covered will be the publication of each servicer’s results in a form of public shaming to provide additional motivation. The problem with that idea is that Saxon’s mortgage holders already know what’s going at the company. Reading about it on the HUD website isn’t going to make them feel any better about submitting lost documents for the fourth time.

    For more information visit www.feldmanlawcenter.com or call 800-588-0425.

  • Feldman Law Center – Are Lenders Giving Homeowners a Break? by Feldman Law Center

    Posted Under: Foreclosure in Mission Viejo  |  August 14, 2009 6:44 AM  |  1,355 views  |  No comments

    Feldman Law Center – News by Feldman Law Center – California’s recently passed anti-foreclosure bill exempted most lenders in the state from its regulations with loopholes big enough to drive a truck through. Trumpeted by legislators as another layer of protection for homeowners, the bill exempted the largest lenders in the state including Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and JP Morgan Chase because they already had loan modification programs in place. Even for the rare lender that might have been out of compliance with the law, and then subject its regulations, adding a loan modification program would exempt it from the mandated 90 day postponement of foreclosure proceedings on delinquent homeowners.

    It was with amazement then that industry watchers marveled at the June foreclosure statistics which showed that foreclosures actually declined even as the state’s default filings increased. Many of the comments made it sound like lenders in California might actually be giving homeowners a break. ForeclosureRadar Chief Executive Sean O’Toole said, “A number of lenders appear to have self-imposed California’s latest foreclosure moratorium on themselves, despite having received an exemption from it.”

    The numbers definitely bear out that there could have been more foreclosures and more properties put up for auction in the month of June. An example of lenders’ restraint is Bank of America, which cut their notice of trustee sale filings by 48% from May to June. Seemingly puzzled by the decrease, Mr. O’Toole commented, “… (it’s) an outcome we are struggling to find an explanation for.” One thing for certain is that the ultimate explanation won’t have anything to do with lenders cutting homeowners a break because they feel sorry for them.

    It’s much more likely that what is being called a self imposed moratorium is based on the lenders choosing the lesser of two evils and the law of supply and demand. A look at a couple of statistics from the California auctions illustrates what the lenders are dealing with and why there aren’t more properties going to auction:

    * Of 22,291 foreclosures taken to auction only 2,687, representing 12% of the total, were sold.

    * Opening bids as set by lenders averaged 39.3% lower than the mortgage balance.

    * Almost half of the properties sold at auction were discounted by 50% or more.

    * Despite the steep discounts and the relatively limited supply, lenders were forced to take back 87% of the properties submitted for auction.

    Those are pretty grim stats given that the 22,000 properties that actually went to auction represents less than 20% of the amount that could have been submitted. Putting salt in the wound, the 2,600 properties that did sell were done at steep discounts and represent about 2% of the total of homes that could have been sold. A lender looking at those numbers would have no motivation at all to foreclose save for special situations where there is perceived value or a buyer waiting on the other side.

    Under normal circumstances, foreclosures typically run in an orderly three part process starting with the filing of a notice of default (NOD). The property then goes to auction at a trustee sale where it is either sold or taken back by the lender. The current bottleneck is occurring at part three of that process because homes aren’t selling and lenders are already flooded with properties in their REO departments. Continuing to foreclose at a brisk pace only adds to the existing backlog, building a supply that isn’t even close to being met by demand. In that situation the lesser evil is to leave the property in limbo and hope that borrowers can fix their mortgage problem or modify the existing loan.

    Leaving properties in limbo also benefits lenders by allowing them to carry properties on their books at a value of their choosing due to Congress’ relaxing of mark to market rules in the spring. A foreclosure sale forces the adjustment of valuation on properties sold at auction so even if properties were selling, it’s unlikely that lenders would be willing to accept massive write-downs at current valuations. In an environment where just about any action a lender can take results in a loss of some sort, moving as slowly as possible might be the only way to minimize damage on a daily basis. It could be that a write-down pace on 2% of the REO portfolio each month is a number that lenders can live with at the moment. Whatever the reason, the break that homeowners are getting right now is subject to change at a moment’s notice.

    For more information about loan modification (mortgage loan modification) visit Feldman Law Center at www.feldmanlawcenter.com

    About Feldman Law Center:

    The Feldman Law Center was founded for the purpose of negotiating loan modifications on behalf of their clients. These negotiations have two major goals; to reduce monthly mortgage payments to a level of affordability for the homeowner and to either stop or avoid foreclosure proceedings. The mission at The Feldman Law Center is to provide the highest level of professional service while delivering the best possible result on each loan modification we negotiate on the behalf of the families we represent.

    Having negotiated over 500 attorney driven mortgage loan modifications, we realize that each homeowner’s situation is unique and that each modification may require a different approach than the one before it. To that end, we can always call on our 25 years of negotiating, knowledge, and real estate experience to provide the most optimal solutions for each family’s situation. While we are negotiating your loan modification with your lenders our friendly and compassionate team will keep you updated all the way on how the process is advancing.

    The people at The Feldman Law Center completely understand the stress of being behind in your monthly payments and the sleepless nights that can be brought on by an impending foreclosure. Rest assured that we will stand with you all the way through the loan modification process and that we are driven to get the best outcome possible for you and your family. If you are struggling with your monthly payments and worried about the threat of foreclosure, we can help. Call The Feldman Law Center today at 800-588-0425.

    Resources:

    Feldman Law Center: Profile – Business Exchange

    Press Release – The Feldman Law Center’s Code of Ethics and Practices

    Loan Modification – Feldman Law Center

    Feldman Law Center, Mission Viejo CA 92691

    Feldman Law Center – The Cream Rises in Loan Modifications

    Feldman Law Center – Ten Tips for a Successful Home Loan Modification

    Feldman Law Center – Saving Thousands with a Loan Modification – Debt Settlement Combination

    Feldman Law Center – Mission Viejo, CA, 92891 – Citysearch

    Feldman Law Center – The New York Times gets it About Half Right

    Feldmanlawcenter.com – Feldman Law Center Company News

    Feldman Law Center

    Feldman Law Center Trulia Profile

« Read older posts
 
Copyright © 2012 Trulia, Inc. All rights reserved.   |  
Have a question? Visit our Help Center to find the answer