While I love reading my friend Martinâ€™s musings, some are more poignant than others, or resonate with me more.
This post, with a few deletions for space, comes from Martin Andleman and I believe nails what I and others often lament, the system is broken and the rule of law must cut both ways.
As I often write, itâ€™s too easy to dismiss those who are not able to make their payments as deadbeats who must be dealt with. Are there some deadbeats? Of course. And if you sleep better at night simply dismissing your fellow Americans who are struggling, so be it. I will work tirelessly to point out to you however, that what happens to the least of us matter to all of us.
PEASE read this and ask yourself the following question; if this is occurring in states where one must go before a court to foreclose, what do you suppose is happening in states where all one must do is follow a procedure?
Here is the post:
David Stern has a $16 million Florida mansion on the Intracoastal Waterway, a $20 million plus, 130-foot jet propelled yacht, four Ferraris, four Porsches, two Mercedes Benzes, one Cadillac and a Bugatti. Last year, Stern bought his next-door neighborâ€™s $8 million home just so he could tear it down and build a tennis court.
David Stern is the â€œForeclosure King.â€ Although there are others of his ilk, his company handled 70,382 foreclosures in 2009 alone, which is almost 200 a day, assuming one could work 365 days a year.
In a speech Stern was giving last year, he referenced the Obama Administrationâ€™s Making Home Affordable foreclosure program, telling the audienceâ€¦ â€œFortunately, itâ€™s failing.â€
Oh, thatâ€™s very funny, Mr. Stern, really very funny stuff.
Sternâ€™s firm has been accused of gouging homeowners trying to get out of default, as exemplified by the 1998 class action lawsuit filed by Tallahassee attorney, Claude Walker on behalf of tens of thousands of homeowners alleging that Stern piled on excessive fees when they were trying to keep their homes. Stern settled the case for $2.2 million after a couple of years, and both the Florida Supreme Court and Florida State Bar Association reprimanded him for â€œprofessional misconduct,â€ related to the case.
And yet, in two consecutive years, 1998 and 1999, Fannie Mae named him â€œAttorney of the Year,â€ which is the perfect illustration of whatâ€™s gone hopelessly wrong in this countryâ€¦ the total disconnect between â€œusâ€ and â€œthemâ€. We the people, at least until recently, have thought that we were still a part of the greatest country on Earth as we pursued the American Dream, while â€œtheyâ€ viewed us only as indebted little pawns on their chessboard, forced to play by their rules, moved around as they saw fit and sacrificed without a second thought.
Between 2006 and 2008, the number of homeowners thrown into foreclosure doubled as a result of the wildly reckless and entirely unregulated bankers of Wall Street destroyed the credit and bond markets, causing the total destruction of the housing market and leaving prices in the free fall in which they remain today. And Sternâ€™s business, quite predictably, began a meteoric rise, with lenders and servicers sending 12 times as many repossessed homes his way. Andy Kroll, writing for Mother Jones, in his article of August 3, 2010, â€œFannie and Freddieâ€™s Foreclosure Barons,â€ reported that Sternâ€™s non-legal revenues went from $40 million to $200 million, as the companyâ€™s employee count shot up from 400 to almost 1,000.
But, as court records show and all involved now understand, there were problems with many of these foreclosures. The legal documentation required was seriously lacking, and Stern saw no problem with routinely â€œfixingâ€ such problems by backdating assignments, changing case chronologies, and in general, doing whatever was necessary to get the job done, regardless of the fraud he was perpetrating on the Florida courts, and to say nothing of the human cost inherent to recklessly putting people out of their homes and onto the streets.
As Floridaâ€™s foreclosure defense attorneys gradually caused the onion of fraud to unpeel in front of the Florida judiciary, Fannie Mae finally dropped him from their list of foreclosure law firms. Sternâ€™s firm has now withdrawn from an unprecedented 150,000 Florida foreclosure cases.
Outspoken Florida foreclosure defense attorney, Matt Weidner says, â€œthe pressure on judges and undue burden placed upon the clerks and others that make up the stateâ€™s judicial system is impossible to overstate.â€
Sitting in the Lee County Courthouse this past week, Weidner told me that he couldnâ€™t help but wonder about the price that Stern will or will not be forced to pay for the chaos thatâ€™s resulted from his firm withdrawing from 150,000 foreclosure cases. â€œThe cost to taxpayers is without question untold, and perhaps even incalculable millionsâ€¦ why is this guy still driving around in a Bugatti?â€ Weidner asks. â€œAnd yet to-date, the Florida State Bar Association has said or done essentially nothing.â€
Weidner says that Sternâ€™s firm averaged roughly $1200 per case, so my calculator shows 150,000 cases to be worth $180 million.
Weidner points out that, â€œThere are still houses going to sale because of work Sternâ€™s firm did, work that we now know was at best inadequate and at worst fraudulent. Legal requirements for foreclosure have not been met and these homes should not, in many cases, be sold. How will our stateâ€™s courts ultimately handle that?â€
Another Florida foreclosure mill, Ben Ezra Katz, has now also been delisted by Fannie Mae as a result of ignoring the stateâ€™s rules of foreclosure, and Weidner points out that itâ€™s not hard to imagine that many such firms have been gearing up, extending themselves to cash in on their foreclosure fueled bonanza. A windfall that now wonâ€™t be coming as planned. â€œHow many of these firms are now going to find themselves insolvent?â€ Weidner also quite reasonably wonders.
April Charney, the Jacksonville Legal Aid lawyer that, perhaps more than any other in the state, has been leading the charge to stop illegal foreclosures and see that the rule of law is upheld, says that sheâ€™s not all that interested in Stern one way or the other. â€œIn the scheme of a criminal enterprise Sternâ€™s just a bag-man. And bag-men get paid quite well, but so what?â€ Charney says as one might explain water being wet or the sky being blue.
â€œWeâ€¦ the peopleâ€¦ are the real villains here,â€ Charney says sadly, â€œfor allowing whatâ€™s happened to happenâ€¦ for not being vigilantâ€¦ for making sure our regulators were regulating. The Center for Responsible Lending has told Congress of the problems and rampant abuses for years, but basically they were ignored.â€